Re: [PATCH 08/17] Add main.c

Kalle Valo
2024-05-30T14:37:45Z

"Nemanov, Michael" <michael.nemanov@ti.com> writes:

> On 5/22/2024 12:46 PM, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> ... > +} > + > +static int read_version_info(struct cc33xx *cc) > +{
>> > + int ret; > + > + cc33xx_info("Wireless driver version %s",
>> DRV_VERSION); Drop > + > + ret =
>> cc33xx_acx_init_get_fw_versions(cc); > + if (ret < 0) { > +
>> cc33xx_error("Get FW version FAILED!"); > + return ret; > + } > + >
>> + cc33xx_info("Wireless firmware version %u.%u.%u.%u", > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->major_version, > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->minor_version, > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->api_version, > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->build_version); > + > +
>> cc33xx_info("Wireless PHY version %u.%u.%u.%u.%u.%u", > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->phy_version[5], > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->phy_version[4], > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->phy_version[3], > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->phy_version[2], > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->phy_version[1], > +
>> cc->all_versions.fw_ver->phy_version[0]); > + > +
>> cc->all_versions.driver_ver = DRV_VERSION; Drop
>
> You mean drop the trace? Will exposing FW/PHY versions via debugfs be
> OK?

I'm guessing the comment was about DRV_VERSION. We don't use any version
strings for drivers as they are useless.

BTW please check your quoting style, it is hard to read your replies.

--