From: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de>
To: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
Cc: <tiwai@suse.com>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
<patches@opensource.cirrus.com>, <alsa-devel@alsa-project.org>,
<linux-sound@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ALSA: hda/cs_dsp_ctl: Actually remove ALSA controls
Date: Fri, 03 May 2024 17:17:15 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87msp79b7o.wl-tiwai@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240503144920.61075-1-rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
On Fri, 03 May 2024 16:49:20 +0200,
Richard Fitzgerald wrote:
>
> hda_cs_dsp_control_remove() must remove the ALSA control when
> deleting all the infrastructure for handling the control.
>
> Without this it is possible for ALSA controls to be left in
> the Soundcard after the amp driver module has been unloaded.
> So the get/set callbacks point to code that no longer exists.
>
> Signed-off-by: Richard Fitzgerald <rf@opensource.cirrus.com>
> Fixes: 3233b978af23 ("ALSA: hda: hda_cs_dsp_ctl: Add Library to support CS_DSP ALSA controls")
> ---
> Note: it would be better to use the control private_free to do the
> cleanup, and that is my plan long-term. But that is a larger change
> to the code.
>
> I like to keep bugfix patches as simple as possible so they are
> low-risk and easy to cherry-pick into older kernels. So this patch
> fixes the bug. Sometime I will send a patch for future kernel
> versions that reworks the cleanup to use private_free.
I also like to keep as simple as possible :)
One slight concern is whether cs_dsp kctls can be deleted at the
snd_card removal (disconnect) before this function gets called.
That is, snd_card_free() of the main card may delete all associated
kctls, and may this function be called afterwards?
If yes, this change would lead to a UAF.
The structure is so complex and I can't follow immediately,
unfortunately...
thanks,
Takashi
> ---
> sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c | 4 ++++
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c b/sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c
> index 463ca06036bf..a42653d3473d 100644
> --- a/sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c
> +++ b/sound/pci/hda/hda_cs_dsp_ctl.c
> @@ -203,6 +203,10 @@ void hda_cs_dsp_control_remove(struct cs_dsp_coeff_ctl *cs_ctl)
> {
> struct hda_cs_dsp_coeff_ctl *ctl = cs_ctl->priv;
>
> + /* Only public firmware controls will have an associated kcontrol */
> + if (ctl && ctl->kctl)
> + snd_ctl_remove(ctl->card, ctl->kctl);
> +
> kfree(ctl);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_NS_GPL(hda_cs_dsp_control_remove, SND_HDA_CS_DSP_CONTROLS);
> --
> 2.39.2
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-05-03 15:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-05-03 14:49 [PATCH] ALSA: hda/cs_dsp_ctl: Actually remove ALSA controls Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-03 15:17 ` Takashi Iwai [this message]
2024-05-03 15:31 ` Richard Fitzgerald
2024-05-03 16:16 ` Takashi Iwai
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87msp79b7o.wl-tiwai@suse.de \
--to=tiwai@suse.de \
--cc=alsa-devel@alsa-project.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sound@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=patches@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=rf@opensource.cirrus.com \
--cc=tiwai@suse.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox