From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
x86@kernel.org, "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bill Wendling <morbo@google.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] x86: use builtins to read eflags
Date: Fri, 04 Feb 2022 01:16:49 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mtj7cwpa.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211229021258.176670-1-morbo@google.com>
On Tue, Dec 28 2021 at 18:12, Bill Wendling wrote:
> GCC and Clang both have builtins to read and write the EFLAGS register.
> This allows the compiler to determine the best way to generate this
> code, which can improve code generation.
>
> This issue arose due to Clang's issue with the "=rm" constraint. Clang
> chooses to be conservative in these situations, and so uses memory
> instead of registers. This is a known issue, which is currently being
> addressed.
>
> However, using builtins is benefiical in general, because it removes the
> burden of determining what's the way to read the flags register from the
> programmer and places it on to the compiler, which has the information
> needed to make that decision. Indeed, this piece of code has had several
> changes over the years, some of which were pinging back and forth to
> determine the correct constraints to use.
>
> With this change, Clang generates better code:
>
> Original code:
> movq $0, -48(%rbp)
> #APP
> # __raw_save_flags
> pushfq
> popq -48(%rbp)
> #NO_APP
> movq -48(%rbp), %rbx
>
> New code:
> pushfq
> popq %rbx
> #APP
>
> Note that the stack slot in the original code is no longer needed in the
> new code, saving a small amount of stack space.
This still lacks any information about the effect on GCC. There is a
world outside clang. It's not my job to validate that.
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-04 0:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211215211847.206208-1-morbo@google.com>
[not found] ` <87mtl1l63m.ffs@tglx>
2021-12-16 19:55 ` [PATCH] x86: use builtins to read eflags Bill Wendling
2021-12-17 12:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2021-12-17 19:39 ` Thomas Gleixner
2022-03-14 23:09 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-03-15 0:08 ` Bill Wendling
[not found] ` <20211215232605.GJ16608@worktop.programming.kicks-ass.net>
2021-12-16 20:00 ` Bill Wendling
2021-12-16 20:07 ` Nick Desaulniers
2021-12-29 2:12 ` [PATCH v2] " Bill Wendling
2022-01-27 20:56 ` Bill Wendling
2022-02-04 0:16 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2022-02-04 0:58 ` Bill Wendling
2022-02-04 0:57 ` [PATCH v3] " Bill Wendling
2022-02-07 22:11 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-02-08 9:14 ` David Laight
2022-02-08 23:18 ` Bill Wendling
2022-02-14 23:53 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-02-10 22:31 ` [PATCH v4] " Bill Wendling
2022-02-11 16:40 ` David Laight
2022-02-11 19:25 ` Bill Wendling
2022-02-11 22:09 ` David Laight
2022-02-11 23:33 ` Bill Wendling
2022-02-12 0:24 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-02-12 9:23 ` Bill Wendling
2022-02-15 0:33 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-03-01 20:19 ` [PATCH v5] " Bill Wendling
2022-03-14 23:07 ` Bill Wendling
[not found] ` <AC3D873E-A28B-41F1-8BF4-2F6F37BCEEB4@zytor.com>
2022-03-15 7:19 ` Bill Wendling
2022-03-17 15:43 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-03-17 18:00 ` Nick Desaulniers
2022-03-17 18:52 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-17 19:45 ` Bill Wendling
2022-03-17 20:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-17 21:10 ` Bill Wendling
2022-03-17 21:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-17 21:45 ` Bill Wendling
2022-03-17 22:51 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-17 23:14 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-17 23:19 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-17 23:31 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-18 0:05 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-17 22:37 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-17 20:13 ` Florian Weimer
2022-03-17 20:36 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-18 0:25 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-18 1:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-18 1:50 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-17 21:05 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-17 21:39 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-18 17:59 ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-03-18 18:19 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-18 21:48 ` Andrew Cooper
2022-03-18 23:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-18 23:42 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-19 1:13 ` Linus Torvalds
2022-03-19 23:15 ` Andy Lutomirski
2022-03-18 22:09 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-18 22:33 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-03-18 22:36 ` David Laight
2022-03-18 22:47 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-03-18 22:43 ` David Laight
2022-03-18 23:03 ` H. Peter Anvin
2022-03-18 23:04 ` Segher Boessenkool
2022-03-18 23:52 ` David Laight
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mtj7cwpa.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=morbo@google.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox