From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Sandeep Maheswaram <sanm@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree
Date: Fri, 29 May 2020 17:24:20 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mu5q250r.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAL_Jsq+cKXO71U_HVG0nZzbQ_B4GwrmcyzkECSTJUAuBzQgcZw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1990 bytes --]
Hi,
Rob Herring <robherring2@gmail.com> writes:
>> >> > > > Today's linux-next merge of the usb tree got a conflict in:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > Documentation/devicetree/bindings/usb/qcom,dwc3.yaml
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > between commit:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > 3828026c9ec8 ("dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Convert USB DWC3 bindings")
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > from the devicetree tree and commits:
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > cd4b54e2ae1f ("dt-bindings: usb: qcom,dwc3: Convert USB DWC3 bindings")
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > from the usb tree.
>> >> > > >
>> >> > > > I fixed it up (I guessed, taking most changes from the former) and can
>> >> > > > carry the fix as necessary. This is now fixed as far as linux-next is
>> >> > > > concerned, but any non trivial conflicts should be mentioned to your
>> >> > > > upstream maintainer when your tree is submitted for merging. You may
>> >> > > > also want to consider cooperating with the maintainer of the
>> >> > > > conflicting tree to minimise any particularly complex conflicts.
>> >> >
>> >> > Ugg, I fixed up a warning on my side...
>> >> >
>> >> > >
>> >> > > Sounds good,t hanks.
>> >> >
>> >> > Greg, can you revert your copy and we can get rid of the conflict.
>>
>> Did things change recently? I always got the message from DT folks that
>> DT changes should go via the driver tree. Has that changed? I can stop
>> taking DT patches, no problem.
>
> Not really. Mainly, I've been taking some schema conversions as they
> tend to be standalone patches and to make sure they validate (this one
> had a warning which I fixed up and that caused the conflict). Most
> bindings don't see multiple updates in a cycle, but this one has
> obviously become a mess.
>
> If it has my Reviewed/Acked-by, then I'm not taking it. If I applied,
> then I've replied saying I did.
fair enough, I may have missed your reply and ended up taking the patch
together with a bigger series.
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 832 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-29 14:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-05-28 6:22 linux-next: manual merge of the usb tree with the devicetree tree Stephen Rothwell
2020-05-28 10:49 ` Greg KH
2020-05-28 14:14 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-29 8:26 ` Greg KH
2020-05-29 8:28 ` Greg KH
2020-05-29 8:44 ` Felipe Balbi
2020-05-29 14:04 ` Rob Herring
2020-05-29 14:24 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-10-18 2:13 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-18 7:56 ` Greg KH
2013-06-25 6:53 Stephen Rothwell
2013-06-25 15:18 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mu5q250r.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=greg@kroah.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=robherring2@gmail.com \
--cc=sanm@codeaurora.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).