From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
Cc: tony@atomide.com, Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com,
sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, peter.chen@freescale.com,
jun.li@freescale.com, grygorii.strashko@ti.com,
yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com, nsekhar@ti.com, b-liu@ti.com,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org, linux-omap@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 3/5] usb: dwc3: omap: Don't set POWERPRESENT
Date: Tue, 10 May 2016 13:33:51 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mvnygq28.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5731B6AD.9070108@ti.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1803 bytes --]
Hi,
Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
> On 10/05/16 13:04, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
>>> On 10/05/16 12:54, Felipe Balbi wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com> writes:
>>>>> TRM [1] recommends that POWERPRESENT bit must not be
>>>>> set and left at it's default value of 0.
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] OMAP542x TRM - http://www.ti.com/lit/pdf/swpu249
>>>>> Section 23.11.4.5.1 Mailbox VBUS/ID Management
>>>>>
>>>>> "Because PIPE powerpresent has a different meaning in host and in device mode,
>>>>> and because of the redundancy with the UTMI signals, the controller ORes
>>>>> together the appropriate PIPE and UTMI inputs to create its internal
>>>>> VBUS status. For that reason, it is recommended to leave field
>>>>> USBOTGSS_UTMI_OTG_STATUS[9] POWERPRESENT at its default value (=0), and only to
>>>>> fill in the USB2 VBUS status fields in the same register."
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@ti.com>
>>>>
>>>> to make sure we avoid regressions, do you mind sharing on which
>>>> platforms you tested this patch ?
>>>>
>>> I tested this on omap5-uevm and dra7-evm.
>>> My am437x board stopped working so couldn't test on that one.
>>
>> would you have a colleague or perhaps an automated test-farm which could
>> run the test for you ? :-)
>>
>> I can take the patch, no problem, but if there are any regressions don't
>> blame me :-)
>>
> Don't worry, blame is on the TRM then :).
alright then, so seems like v8 will be queued. Just remember we're
pretty close to opening the merge window and I have already sent a pull
request to Greg. On the bright side, your patches will sit in linux-next
for quite some time :-) (well, until -rc1 is tagged)
--
balbi
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 818 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-05-10 10:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-05-10 9:51 [PATCH v7 0/5] dwc3: omap: fixes and dual-role preparation Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 9:51 ` [PATCH v7 1/5] usb: dwc3: omap: use request_threaded_irq() Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 9:58 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 10:04 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 10:12 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 10:21 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-11 8:17 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-11 9:47 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-11 11:46 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-11 12:39 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-11 13:52 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 9:51 ` [PATCH v7 2/5] usb: dwc3: omap: Mark the interrupt handler as shared Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 9:51 ` [PATCH v7 3/5] usb: dwc3: omap: Don't set POWERPRESENT Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 9:54 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 9:59 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 10:04 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 10:23 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 10:33 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
2016-05-10 10:24 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 9:51 ` [PATCH v7 4/5] usb: dwc3: omap: Pass VBUS and ID events transparently Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 9:55 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 10:00 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 10:05 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 10:13 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 10:13 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 9:51 ` [PATCH v7 5/5] usb: dwc3: core: cleanup IRQ resources Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 10:03 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 10:10 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 10:14 ` Felipe Balbi
2016-05-10 11:45 ` Roger Quadros
2016-05-10 11:48 ` Felipe Balbi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mvnygq28.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=Joao.Pinto@synopsys.com \
--cc=b-liu@ti.com \
--cc=grygorii.strashko@ti.com \
--cc=jun.li@freescale.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nsekhar@ti.com \
--cc=peter.chen@freescale.com \
--cc=rogerq@ti.com \
--cc=sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
--cc=yoshihiro.shimoda.uh@renesas.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).