public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "Martin Liška" <mliska@suse.cz>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Add --show-total-period for perf annotate
Date: Fri, 22 May 2015 21:08:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mw0wc4vt.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555F3F8A.6000204@suse.cz> ("Martin Liška"'s message of "Fri, 22 May 2015 16:39:06 +0200")

Martin Liška <mliska@suse.cz> writes:

> I've been working on a new feature for perf annotate, which should be able to annotate
> instructions with total spent time (compared to percentage usage).
>
> Let's consider following use-case. You want to compare two different compilers
> on the same code base and let's assume 90% of wall-time is spent in a single function.
> Moreover, let's say that these compilers produce assembly of a totally different size.
>
> In such case, it's very useful to get an approximation of spent time on a bunch of instructions,
> which can be compared among other compilers. Otherwise, one has to somehow sum percentages and compare
> it to size of a function.

perf diff does not handle this? Especially with the differential
profiling options it should.

>> @@ -623,6 +624,8 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
>  	if (!target__none(&opts->target) && !opts->initial_delay)
>  		perf_evlist__enable(rec->evlist);
>  
> +	t0 = rdclock();
> +
>  	/*
>  	 * Let the child rip
>  	 */
> @@ -692,6 +695,9 @@ static int __cmd_record(struct record *rec, int argc, const char **argv)
>  		goto out_child;
>  	}
>  
> +	t1 = rdclock();
> +	walltime_nsecs = t1 - t0;

The walltime can be later computed by the difference of the first and
the last time stamp after sorting the events. So you don't need the new header.

-Andi

-- 
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-23  4:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-22 14:39 [RFC] Add --show-total-period for perf annotate Martin Liška
2015-05-23  4:08 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2015-05-25  7:46   ` Martin Liška
2015-05-25 15:14     ` Andi Kleen
2015-05-26 12:34       ` Martin Liška
2015-05-26 17:03         ` Andi Kleen
2015-05-27  8:46           ` Martin Liška
2015-05-27  9:04             ` Martin Liška
2015-05-27 14:04             ` Andi Kleen
2015-05-29 12:58               ` Martin Liška
2015-05-29 15:55                 ` Andi Kleen
2015-06-01 11:08                   ` Martin Liška

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87mw0wc4vt.fsf@tassilo.jf.intel.com \
    --to=andi@firstfloor.org \
    --cc=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mliska@suse.cz \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox