From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com>
Cc: avi@redhat.com, mtosatti@redhat.com, glommer@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 17/17] Add timekeeping documentation
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:55:21 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mxuuujgm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1276587259-32319-18-git-send-email-zamsden@redhat.com> (Zachary Amsden's message of "Mon\, 14 Jun 2010 21\:34\:19 -1000")
Zachary Amsden <zamsden@redhat.com> writes:
I think listing all the obscure bits in the PIT was an attempt to
weed out the weak and weary readers early, right?
> +this as well. Several hardware limitations make the problem worse - if it is
> +not possible to write the full 32-bits of the TSC, it may be impossible to
> +match the TSC in newly arriving CPUs to that of the rest of the system,
> +resulting in unsynchronized TSCs. This may be done by BIOS or system software,
> +but in practice, getting a perfectly synchronized TSC will not be possible
> +unless all values are read from the same clock, which generally only is
> +possible on single socket systems or those with special hardware
> +support.
That's not true, single crystal for all sockets is very common
as long as you only have a single motherboard.
Of course there might be other reasons why the TSC is unsynchronized
(e.g. stop count in C-states), but the single clock is not the problem.
> +3.4) TSC and C-states
> +
> +C-states, or idling states of the processor, especially C1E and deeper sleep
> +states may be problematic for TSC as well. The TSC may stop advancing in such
> +a state, resulting in a TSC which is behind that of other CPUs when execution
> +is resumed. Such CPUs must be detected and flagged by the operating system
> +based on CPU and chipset identifications.
> +
> +The TSC in such a case may be corrected by catching it up to a known external
> +clocksource.
... This is fixed in recent CPUs ...
> +
> +3.5) TSC frequency change / P-states
> +
> +To make things slightly more interesting, some CPUs may change requency. They
> +may or may not run the TSC at the same rate, and because the frequency change
> +may be staggered or slewed, at some points in time, the TSC rate may not be
> +known other than falling within a range of values. In this case, the TSC will
> +not be a stable time source, and must be calibrated against a known, stable,
> +external clock to be a usable source of time.
> +
> +Whether the TSC runs at a constant rate or scales with the P-state is model
> +dependent and must be determined by inspecting CPUID, chipset or various MSR
> +fields.
... In general newer CPUs should not have problems with this anymore
> +
> +4) Virtualization Problems
> +
> +Timekeeping is especially problematic for virtualization because a number of
> +challenges arise. The most obvious problem is that time is now shared between
> +the host and, potentially, a number of virtual machines. This happens
> +naturally on X86 systems when SMM mode is used by the BIOS, but not to such a
> +degree nor with such frequency. However, the fact that SMM mode may cause
The SMM reference here seems at best odd.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-06-17 8:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 70+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-06-15 7:34 TSC cleanups, fixes, documentation for KVM Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 01/17] Eliminate duplicated timer code Zachary Amsden
2010-06-16 13:07 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 02/17] Make cpu_tsc_khz updates use local CPU Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:02 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 03/17] Unify vendor TSC logic Zachary Amsden
2010-06-16 8:10 ` Jason Wang
2010-06-16 13:22 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-17 8:03 ` Jason Wang
2010-06-16 18:42 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-17 8:15 ` Jason Wang
2010-06-17 20:30 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 04/17] Fix deep C-state TSC desynchronization Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:09 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 8:14 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-16 8:10 ` Jason Wang
2010-06-16 18:43 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-16 13:24 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-16 19:20 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 05/17] Keep SMP VMs more in sync on unstable TSC Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:11 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 8:11 ` Jason Wang
2010-06-16 13:32 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-16 21:15 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 06/17] Rename KVM_REQ_KVMCLOCK_UPDATE Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 07/17] Perform hardware_enable in CPU_STARTING callback Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 08/17] Add clock sync request to hardware enable Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:24 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 09/17] Move scale_delta into common header Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 10/17] Make KVM clock computation work for other scales Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 11/17] Fix a possible backwards warp of kvmclock Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:40 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 20:37 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 23:47 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-16 0:21 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-16 0:39 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-16 8:11 ` Jason Wang
2010-06-16 13:58 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-16 14:13 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-16 14:58 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-16 22:38 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-16 19:36 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 12/17] Add helper function get_kernel_ns Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:41 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 21:03 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 21:13 ` john stultz
2010-06-16 8:12 ` Jason Wang
2010-06-16 14:03 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 13/17] Add TSC offset tracking Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:44 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 14/17] Fix SVM VMCB reset Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 15/17] Fix AMD C1 TSC desynchronization Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:47 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 9:21 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 14:46 ` Roedel, Joerg
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 16/17] TSC reset compensation Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:51 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 20:32 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-16 0:27 ` Marcelo Tosatti
2010-06-16 0:32 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-16 13:52 ` Glauber Costa
2010-06-16 22:36 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 7:34 ` [PATCH 17/17] Add timekeeping documentation Zachary Amsden
2010-06-15 8:51 ` Avi Kivity
2010-06-15 20:27 ` Randy Dunlap
2010-06-16 23:59 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-17 8:55 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2010-06-17 21:14 ` Zachary Amsden
2010-06-18 7:49 ` Andi Kleen
2010-06-18 16:33 ` Zachary Amsden
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mxuuujgm.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=avi@redhat.com \
--cc=glommer@redhat.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=zamsden@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox