From: Ben Pfaff <blp@cs.stanford.edu>
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Memory corruption in 8390.c ?
Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2006 10:23:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mzc65soy.fsf@benpfaff.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1150909982.15275.100.camel@localhost.localdomain
Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> writes:
> --- drivers/net/8390.c~ 2006-06-21 17:41:12.006145536 +0100
> +++ drivers/net/8390.c 2006-06-21 17:41:12.007145384 +0100
> @@ -275,12 +275,14 @@
> struct ei_device *ei_local = (struct ei_device *) netdev_priv(dev);
> int send_length = skb->len, output_page;
> unsigned long flags;
> + char buf[64];
> + char *data = skb->data;
>
> if (skb->len < ETH_ZLEN) {
> - skb = skb_padto(skb, ETH_ZLEN);
> - if (skb == NULL)
> - return 0;
> + memset(buf, 0, ETH_ZLEN); /* more efficient than doing just the needed bits */
> + memcpy(buf, data, ETH_ZLEN);
Is this really correct? It zeros out ETH_ZLEN bytes only to
immediately copy over all of them again.
> send_length = ETH_ZLEN;
> + data = buf;
> }
>
> /* Mask interrupts from the ethercard.
> @@ -347,7 +349,7 @@
> * trigger the send later, upon receiving a Tx done interrupt.
> */
>
> - ei_block_output(dev, send_length, skb->data, output_page);
> + ei_block_output(dev, send_length, data, output_page);
>
> if (! ei_local->txing)
> {
--
Ben Pfaff
email: blp@cs.stanford.edu
web: http://benpfaff.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-06-21 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-06-21 16:28 Possible leaks in network drivers Eric Sesterhenn
2006-06-21 17:05 ` Randy.Dunlap
2006-06-21 17:13 ` Memory corruption in 8390.c ? (was Re: Possible leaks in network drivers) Alan Cox
2006-06-21 17:23 ` Ben Pfaff [this message]
2006-06-21 17:54 ` Memory corruption in 8390.c ? Alan Cox
2006-06-21 18:03 ` Ben Pfaff
2006-06-21 20:50 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-21 17:59 ` PATCH: Re: Memory corruption in 8390.c ? (and hp100 xirc2ps smc9194 ....) Alan Cox
2006-06-21 19:00 ` Olivier Galibert
2006-06-21 17:50 ` Possible leaks in network drivers Eric Sesterhenn
2006-06-22 1:41 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-22 0:55 ` Memory corruption in 8390.c ? (was Re: Possible leaks in network drivers) Herbert Xu
2006-06-22 2:30 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-22 8:22 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-22 8:29 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-22 8:57 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-22 9:02 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-22 9:12 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-22 8:26 ` Memory corruption in 8390.c ? David Miller
2006-06-22 8:30 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-22 8:34 ` David Miller
2006-06-22 11:34 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-22 11:29 ` Herbert Xu
2006-06-22 13:25 ` Alan Cox
2006-06-23 3:32 ` Jeff Garzik
2006-06-22 11:33 ` Arjan van de Ven
2006-06-22 12:00 ` Erik Mouw
2006-06-22 13:10 ` Alan Cox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mzc65soy.fsf@benpfaff.org \
--to=blp@cs.stanford.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox