From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264658AbUFXOjW (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:39:22 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264660AbUFXOjV (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:39:21 -0400 Received: from mail.parknet.co.jp ([210.171.160.6]:46346 "EHLO mail.parknet.co.jp") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264658AbUFXOjP (ORCPT ); Thu, 24 Jun 2004 10:39:15 -0400 To: Arjan van de Ven Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Allow root to choose vfat policy to UTF8 References: <20040624073858.GA17435@devserv.devel.redhat.com> From: OGAWA Hirofumi Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 23:39:00 +0900 In-Reply-To: <20040624073858.GA17435@devserv.devel.redhat.com> Message-ID: <87n02tkol7.fsf@devron.myhome.or.jp> User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3.50 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arjan van de Ven writes: > --- linux-2.6.7/fs/fat/inode.c~ 2004-06-24 11:20:43.941750760 +0200 > +++ linux-2.6.7/fs/fat/inode.c 2004-06-24 11:20:43.943750521 +0200 > @@ -499,9 +499,8 @@ > } > /* UTF8 doesn't provide FAT semantics */ > if (!strcmp(opts->iocharset, "utf8")) { > - printk(KERN_ERR "FAT: utf8 is not a valid IO charset" > - " for FAT filesystems\n"); > - return -EINVAL; > + printk(KERN_ERR "FAT: utf8 is not a recommended IO charset" > + " for FAT filesystems, filesystem will be case sensitive!\n"); > } Umm.. why don't use "iocharset=,utf8" instead? This is less unsatisfactory than it option. Would we still need it? If we still need, I think patch should be applied. -- OGAWA Hirofumi