From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55])
	(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 09D78275B1A
	for <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Wed, 24 Jun 2026 12:38:20 +0000 (UTC)
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55
ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116;
	t=1782304702; cv=none; b=rUKzjfB+GfgKwhSceOuog+IKrcvaJvSP6+ZpX9XmbQb4cGWDnppwqUiHDqDUBcmzMj3R9xpz7BXe8AWrgrnaSJ8UzdTMmBttCaAjspoz5j5LMUBZJTs9XLfl1VQCUvqPVW/bDH1oujqUlBHkpaj8S5TNPGV3l6lRh8BOPq/sADo=
ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org;
	s=arc-20240116; t=1782304702; c=relaxed/simple;
	bh=fUGm+MMcmwFGtPy7Lale2NIYDyisNu79U7nBOET1+5Y=;
	h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:
	 MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=dTH5gjfpDj0dAyLtFPIrb0gALfjCbhza8e1bGg3YQeH5gkBWZ/JJGNcMwrS/vLut6v0Y++XXa969uqzb1nFjIo5veEHmUO8jGxd7O1TojEecsC5/rAXVHe3b3wdbumUaLlTHot8r87pI5Pvn85IS2coS4y71K8C50JViwAid08c=
ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=FUrMx08N; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=1V5FcqXB; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de
Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org;
	dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="FUrMx08N";
	dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="1V5FcqXB"
From: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de;
	s=2020; t=1782304698;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=fUGm+MMcmwFGtPy7Lale2NIYDyisNu79U7nBOET1+5Y=;
	b=FUrMx08NM8VmDUxmGZEFptBKWTqfsm7CNKV7viI136LvU4KkmA5kFU7gE4y1vAEjC+cPdv
	02eFnI2KQAVt+eRTi+5LaPYCW1SA8D5P7iOwB1dOBJAZB5e7x8mOsUQlDdIClXStolmF7x
	9DnUFWsayXw3nfeqi3XpmoLTTLwsF8rWxVkNPB9I6GPE7UkefDt+SWhSK+kS4jfR9qo3Nn
	5gZETXbOXDdBjowyifdYQlMCQgubnG4x1In4qxX1zl82FJZvcDBnkjohPNsulMFGTjm+Y7
	g6vg8/5Zpou97EXKt60wKDjRQnHDtorxf8x1HoZNHn6lNEzRHqKBC7o62bcfFA==
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de;
	s=2020e; t=1782304698;
	h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id:
	 to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type:
	 in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references;
	bh=fUGm+MMcmwFGtPy7Lale2NIYDyisNu79U7nBOET1+5Y=;
	b=1V5FcqXB0HrwaHTtBBGbGNODlWgvLMdKb4tlHMdYOnt+IfW0ETwzkzP0X+dbWnA+fckJAv
	fXjrZNaerK6KAsCA==
To: Rui Qi <qirui.001@bytedance.com>, palmer@dabbelt.com, pjw@kernel.org,
 aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, alex@ghiti.fr, conor@kernel.org
Cc: linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
 samuel.holland@sifive.com, Rui Qi <qirui.001@bytedance.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: Fix 32-bit call_on_irq_stack() frame pointer ABI
In-Reply-To: <20260624113148.3723541-1-qirui.001@bytedance.com>
References: <20260624113148.3723541-1-qirui.001@bytedance.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2026 14:38:17 +0200
Message-ID: <87o6h06rly.fsf@yellow.woof>
Precedence: bulk
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+subscribe@vger.kernel.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:linux-kernel+unsubscribe@vger.kernel.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain

"Rui Qi" <qirui.001@bytedance.com> writes:
> This is a resubmission of Samuel Holland's patch [1] which was
> posted in May 2024 but never merged. The bug still exists in the
> current tree.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240530001733.1407654-2-samuel.holland@sifive.com/

I don't think we should keep this part in the commit message. And
Matthew's Reviewed-by should be included.

But I leave that to the maintainers, the diff looks correct to me.

Reviewed-by: Nam Cao <namcao@linutronix.de>

Nam