From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61F1D253328; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739288567; cv=none; b=Uzo1g4a+Nz6p6odc4YLLvxcuiYpxJyl+twkTkN/xVVlgzrAyJQ1yPGt8l89V6W10W2AgZnxTPQY8M8zeobp80VzDrrvx0RTS0bMeKyo30oqgdy99KQnzZKIRQQPqyKRWEs++RwjbwOe4WUo8w/ghkVL2Ci1mKqoTBp4fntdCkdw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1739288567; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EKygjR6jy2VKy3BaVqpi3MnTL07JCgyNxMFMlmAnETo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=MFbE8Xfm+i7fYJo38XkNiUySQk0iaMGuS/W+OtAYCEZLuw6HLkU6edslSbnio8K9SFtHIzCRq4BOFUnBQu9W+Ia/mq4h4FfnyihjQ/TfyRcTMlTdIq3z88kgwKF+T3tE05/+SQ+jEMvcZqWArjKAZjLononVtooCW4sNktQD7I4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=u6a5jyMR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="u6a5jyMR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 83E49C4CEDD; Tue, 11 Feb 2025 15:42:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1739288566; bh=EKygjR6jy2VKy3BaVqpi3MnTL07JCgyNxMFMlmAnETo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=u6a5jyMRVl8jqaXnE8UuWqU9bSX6uGte98LQxys4lzz7JAqaX0gBDnYKa4d2Vduoj jmhGTThs0SzyPbKiOpZHM2+qRMUrXLZ1gPio4nJDcZHRlx0bb/t33SZ4aMjULNeGvg tjK+KCrp5t+nIEVaR0Mr6x6cYqBWjS1kM9bKLmxs9wFlAzrk7zMm5Nqru2e7lU1vy4 jn+Eomblmxa58sFK5dEfS6IiEAsUXeR5oeAInDnIHVv4xM1dWT0c7V9sQgl/XTCxdM L2EI0oGAJs+9mVLV5wsHF8x51Y1zZSANBmCXml74h/av7/bjmRcHxqs27aVQXtbanX qcSSv4/FgkpUg== From: Andreas Hindborg To: Cc: "Jens Korinth via B4 Relay" , "Miguel Ojeda" , "Alex Gaynor" , "Boqun Feng" , "Gary Guo" , =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Roy Baron , "Benno Lossin" , "Alice Ryhl" , "Trevor Gross" , "Rust For Linux" , "FUJITA Tomonori" , "Dirk Behme" , "Linux Kernel" Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/3] rust: Add pr_*_once macros In-Reply-To: (jens korinth's message of "Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:29:56 +0100") References: <20241126-pr_once_macros-v4-0-410b8ca9643e@tuta.io> <87zfish69f.fsf@kernel.org> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2025 16:42:25 +0100 Message-ID: <87o6z8h4im.fsf@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable writes: > Hi! > >>=C2=A0Thanks for the patch! Do you plan on sending a new version?=C2=A0If= not, do you mind if I send v5? > > I think there is currently no consensus on how exactly it should be done = (or at least I was confused about that). If you=E2=80=99re actively using t= he patch please go ahead! Active usage is always the best argument in such = cases. I was informed this patch set is the correct way to emit a warning in the module_params patch set [1]. I did not follow all the discussion so I am not sure either. But I'll look into the discussion then. Best regards, Andreas Hindborg [1] https://lore.kernel.org/rust-for-linux/20250204-module-params-v3-v5-0-b= f5ec2041625@kernel.org/