From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net (relay7-d.mail.gandi.net [217.70.183.200]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 535C71B87DD; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:15:00 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734981303; cv=none; b=Io+JoRMKEggA//0VY5L3q0cglVWXNVEWgPdnr/V02iWWOoH+obs4x0di5G+rDAMWdFd05UPBBfCSBp6QBuL2OpNP7obbVZ2li5xQ0b3R+/tTUWGml4JGgPx8ewEeXDHZz5TT+LQ0ZhIbn6PMUGKbTLOFEscHI6N0X4WpnBDZHzc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1734981303; c=relaxed/simple; bh=U2OuHp4lYYEqziPyERTFGv6tmQUIwi6y4dJXQ7EdiOM=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=YX6hfdb2Hw2yOGzCRZgQufdw9RmeSazUiAeQZsB5Mkei2qJ3BWvMHoj/FypBRr3654Xo1eXFZ12RnDH5Fjtt3TtKw2R19MPziAwDiOgbSOCxzmmlTaEuNkHQ2025ohf3+Sk8abb1A/gd9BcOBByNp7dN9OEeahq8iJ571anUIek= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b=Lb+mzfiK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=217.70.183.200 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=reject dis=none) header.from=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=bootlin.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=bootlin.com header.i=@bootlin.com header.b="Lb+mzfiK" Received: by mail.gandi.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1421C20003; Mon, 23 Dec 2024 19:14:57 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=bootlin.com; s=gm1; t=1734981299; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=qIeJWXZlfXZpFSIC+Ak+j2IOuvjq9EfINowGfwcIn9g=; b=Lb+mzfiKlKygiX60rPfm1+kW4cS17UC/FiL6RPAs7xgtZM7dRqNLtNP4f+z+vLPnU8UStE rvyPZ2C6ebwe8be1HRCJ9dduz7Kppxq4D+66mFvWDCxzkwwcnIS6Qg5CohEO+s/PqRLaB2 n2KuVAP7e32xeShRm/U8OI0XiYQb7/RyvSHf4tMUsB4hwS17m4pZcVU/o2bg5ZsPYtVe4j OCF75MzC/Jv9feaPWPJX3ID1DwXmJxxjR2ggu8L54cB8Nq5LBLFNkZS09mwULTAKG7x660 PtPqLx3AtQQk5/Z8MIQ0BNNDokBKgg7SMSOq0juxQR6F/SK4fnAVbSEb5dVujQ== From: Miquel Raynal To: Cc: Md Sadre Alam , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , Subject: Re: [PATCH v14 0/8] Add QPIC SPI NAND driver In-Reply-To: <87mshe58gq.fsf@bootlin.com> (Miquel Raynal's message of "Mon, 02 Dec 2024 17:57:09 +0100") References: <20241120091507.1404368-1-quic_mdalam@quicinc.com> <87mshe58gq.fsf@bootlin.com> User-Agent: mu4e 1.12.7; emacs 29.4 Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2024 20:14:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87o712qki7.fsf@bootlin.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-GND-Sasl: miquel.raynal@bootlin.com Hi Mark, >> v14: >> * Updated commit message >> * Fix spelling mistake >> * Remove "inline" from multiple APIs from qcom_nandc.c file >> * Move '|' in qcom_param_page_type_exec() APIs at the end of line > > I guess it is now time to move on, I can apply patches 2-5 and share an > immutable tag. Do you want an immutable tag or will you wait the next cycle to apply the spi patches? Thanks, Miqu=C3=A8l > However, due to the frequent inconsistencies observed > during the lifetime of this patchset, we might be slightly more > conservative than usual and split the patches over two kernel > releases. I fear there might be annoying fixes on the mtd side needed > because of some side effects. Without these, the spi tree might have > broken qcom support for several weeks. What do you think? > > Cheers, > Miqu=C3=A8l