From: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 12/17] signal: Remove zap_other_threads
Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:10:34 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o77xfu85.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87o77xinmt.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org> (Eric W. Biederman's message of "Tue, 18 Jun 2024 23:04:42 -0500")
The three callers of zap_other_threads want different things. The
function do_group_exit wants to set the exit code and it does not care
about the number of threads exiting. In de_thread the current thread
is not exiting so there is not really an exit code.
Since schedule_task_exit_locked factors out the tricky bits stop
sharing the loop in zap_other_threads between de_thread, get_signal
and do_group_exit.
Signed-off-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
---
fs/exec.c | 12 +++++++++---
include/linux/sched/signal.h | 1 -
kernel/exit.c | 9 ++++++++-
kernel/signal.c | 25 +++++++------------------
4 files changed, 24 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/exec.c b/fs/exec.c
index 0d64313716bf..57d617917b1c 100644
--- a/fs/exec.c
+++ b/fs/exec.c
@@ -1072,6 +1072,7 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
struct signal_struct *sig = tsk->signal;
struct sighand_struct *oldsighand = tsk->sighand;
spinlock_t *lock = &oldsighand->siglock;
+ struct task_struct *t;
if (thread_group_empty(tsk))
goto no_thread_group;
@@ -1090,9 +1091,14 @@ static int de_thread(struct task_struct *tsk)
}
sig->group_exec_task = tsk;
- sig->notify_count = zap_other_threads(tsk);
- if (!thread_group_leader(tsk))
- sig->notify_count--;
+ sig->group_stop_count = 0;
+ sig->notify_count = 0;
+ __for_each_thread(sig, t) {
+ if (t == tsk)
+ continue;
+ sig->notify_count++;
+ schedule_task_exit_locked(t);
+ }
while (sig->notify_count) {
__set_current_state(TASK_KILLABLE);
diff --git a/include/linux/sched/signal.h b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
index 48b67162b38c..250bd537aa6a 100644
--- a/include/linux/sched/signal.h
+++ b/include/linux/sched/signal.h
@@ -338,7 +338,6 @@ extern void force_sig(int);
extern void force_fatal_sig(int);
extern void force_exit_sig(int);
extern int send_sig(int, struct task_struct *, int);
-extern int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p);
extern struct sigqueue *sigqueue_alloc(void);
extern void sigqueue_free(struct sigqueue *);
extern int send_sigqueue(struct sigqueue *, struct pid *, enum pid_type);
diff --git a/kernel/exit.c b/kernel/exit.c
index 902af3beb7cc..564bf17f4589 100644
--- a/kernel/exit.c
+++ b/kernel/exit.c
@@ -1010,9 +1010,16 @@ do_group_exit(int exit_code)
/* Another thread got here before we took the lock. */
exit_code = sig->group_exit_code;
else {
+ struct task_struct *t;
+
sig->group_exit_code = exit_code;
sig->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT;
- zap_other_threads(current);
+ sig->group_stop_count = 0;
+ __for_each_thread(sig, t) {
+ if (t == current)
+ continue;
+ schedule_task_exit_locked(t);
+ }
current->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
}
spin_unlock_irq(&sighand->siglock);
diff --git a/kernel/signal.c b/kernel/signal.c
index ac4ac3aeda0a..2b0f6d8baebb 100644
--- a/kernel/signal.c
+++ b/kernel/signal.c
@@ -1376,23 +1376,6 @@ void schedule_task_exit_locked(struct task_struct *task)
}
}
-/*
- * Nuke all other threads in the group.
- */
-int zap_other_threads(struct task_struct *p)
-{
- struct task_struct *t;
- int count = 0;
-
- p->signal->group_stop_count = 0;
-
- for_other_threads(p, t) {
- count++;
- schedule_task_exit_locked(t);
- }
- return count;
-}
-
struct sighand_struct *__lock_task_sighand(struct task_struct *tsk,
unsigned long *flags)
{
@@ -2744,6 +2727,7 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
for (;;) {
bool group_exit_needed = false;
struct k_sigaction *ka;
+ struct task_struct *t;
enum pid_type type;
int exit_code;
@@ -2891,7 +2875,12 @@ bool get_signal(struct ksignal *ksig)
else {
signal->group_exit_code = exit_code;
signal->flags = SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT;
- zap_other_threads(current);
+ signal->group_stop_count = 0;
+ __for_each_thread(signal, t) {
+ if (t == current)
+ continue;
+ schedule_task_exit_locked(t);
+ }
current->jobctl |= JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT;
}
fatal:
--
2.41.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-06-19 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-06-09 14:23 [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-09 14:24 ` [PATCH 1/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-09 18:28 ` [PATCH 0/1] " Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 10:50 ` Q: css_task_iter_advance() && dying_tasks Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 11:08 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 20:02 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-10 20:00 ` Tejun Heo
2024-06-10 12:15 ` [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-10 15:29 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 15:42 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-10 16:18 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-13 15:45 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-15 14:53 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-17 18:37 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 3:48 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:04 ` [PATCH 0/17] exit: complete synchronize_group_exit Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:05 ` [PATCH 01/17] signal: Make SIGKILL during coredumps an explicit special case Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 15:50 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 18:09 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 19:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 5:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-21 10:40 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-21 16:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:05 ` [PATCH 02/17] signal: Compute the process exit_code in get_signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:06 ` [PATCH 03/17] coredump: Consolidate the work to allow SIGKILL during coredumps Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:34 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:06 ` [PATCH 04/17] signal: In get_signal call do_exit when it is unnecessary to shoot down threads Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:35 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH 05/17] signal: Bring down all threads when handling a non-coredump fatal signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-25 12:56 ` Oleg Nesterov
2024-06-19 4:07 ` [PATCH 06/17] signal: Add JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT to mark exiting tasks Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:08 ` [PATCH 07/17] signal: Always set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT for " Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-30 14:00 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-19 4:08 ` [PATCH 08/17] signal: Don't target tasks that are exiting Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:09 ` [PATCH 09/17] signal: Test for process exit or de_thread using task_exit_pending Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:09 ` [PATCH 10/17] signal: Only set JOBCTL_WILL_EXIT if it is not already set Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:10 ` [PATCH 11/17] signal: Make individual tasks exiting a first class concept Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:10 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2024-06-19 4:11 ` [PATCH 13/17] signal: Stop skipping current in do_group_exit & get_signal Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-28 5:43 ` kernel test robot
2024-06-19 4:11 ` [PATCH 14/17] signal: Factor out schedule_group_exit_locked Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:12 ` [PATCH 15/17] ptrace: Separate task->ptrace_code out from task->exit_code Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:12 ` [PATCH 16/17] signal: Record the exit_code when an exit is scheduled Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 4:13 ` [PATCH 17/17] signal: Set SIGNAL_GROUP_EXIT when all tasks have decided to exit Eric W. Biederman
2024-06-19 20:18 ` [PATCH 0/1] exit: kill signal_struct->quick_threads Oleg Nesterov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o77xfu85.fsf_-_@email.froward.int.ebiederm.org \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox