From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 24853154BE8; Wed, 3 Apr 2024 19:10:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712171404; cv=none; b=W/iUOQEB1uwwdbPSld8qxzu8u/7TUHqTRtlu3v9lQjJWfJpBcJS1NaBPq6ceViNh6P6OmSG//NU2gJQ4SzxFHGwvPAtEiCAH9vBlIwY0lqKcQRxZj+6wOWDTNmdAJIvrSoF+x1WIb4WqdGb45d+0Tvo+smKnpCWN9KJ6lehXjPk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1712171404; c=relaxed/simple; bh=pzIK4B66bc749NQfKqD2bPVYkt2kauVqKBN7X+SGq3E=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=TaXQj+65uaiikNzYDAYXElADaBjuj0aYe9TVteR12RGRwdGbYaHuyZDwo/btgGPCOquXXOQqN8YyFrqQvLhDwnPs9lzbvvaiyVXngAfd6UuunuoM6nVD8NxC4I03lELXb3A4a8aU6ql0f9k6ij5tipDw0+DO9WCX2ErnbEtyNjo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=xShiaKJt; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=yQTIGrSR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="xShiaKJt"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="yQTIGrSR" From: Thomas Gleixner DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1712171400; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pzIK4B66bc749NQfKqD2bPVYkt2kauVqKBN7X+SGq3E=; b=xShiaKJtyR1gQrMBFejJXh9EOxZcQKqLRlqUo2VQSNyezhFjw8uL7AgQVFFH3WoL8UWVoM qqUbWmOt5mj7xv+xIIlInxnDutryQDoqKhi5UaxGJfp76YuXAoBb3PoIvdcL0ctW6D/KoS 8KOCCzs68MUSN4ArjooctEz4Fa3elbUWdBF1j8MIzrtezNp3EWgUqixRTFk8TMs3U/ygR1 Lx/T82SO6tQXwLAOb2sNpdKoxFe0QY8FToetMe5ASjJXWTJW+CviQKSAyKq7zvO1ci2aRb R+tfAvHyWCd/4SnXMxiT0h/An0GqR2l7yUeNNoSymJbC/q2By6Qput9Hss7KTw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1712171400; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=pzIK4B66bc749NQfKqD2bPVYkt2kauVqKBN7X+SGq3E=; b=yQTIGrSRROvqb/a+uelr9JkgAlV+FG5YEN1BnUHIl/D0lqJpMHfdH1p9uU2wBTSg+ans0g Vl3NTnuxa6I1+TBA== To: John Stultz Cc: Oleg Nesterov , Marco Elver , Peter Zijlstra , Ingo Molnar , "Eric W. Biederman" , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org, Dmitry Vyukov , kasan-dev@googlegroups.com, Edward Liaw , Carlos Llamas , Greg Kroah-Hartman Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] posix-timers: Prefer delivery of signals to the current thread In-Reply-To: References: <87sf02bgez.ffs@tglx> <87r0fmbe65.ffs@tglx> Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2024 21:09:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7aqb6uw.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 03 2024 at 11:16, John Stultz wrote: > On Wed, Apr 3, 2024 at 9:32=E2=80=AFAM Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Thanks for this, Thomas! > > Just FYI: testing with 6.1, the test no longer hangs, but I don't see > the SKIP behavior. It just fails: > not ok 6 check signal distribution > # Totals: pass:5 fail:1 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0 > > I've not had time yet to dig into what's going on, but let me know if > you need any further details. That's weird. I ran it on my laptop with 6.1.y ... What kind of machine is that?