From: John Ogness <john.ogness@linutronix.de>
To: "Leonardo Bras" <leobras@redhat.com>,
"Ilpo Järvinen" <ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
Jiri Slaby <jirislaby@kernel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@gmail.com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com>,
Marcelo Tosatti <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-serial <linux-serial@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND RFC PATCH v1 2/2] serial/8250: Avoid getting lock in RT atomic context
Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2024 10:07:45 +0106 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7djaubq.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ZabJGefGkrs0SNzW@LeoBras>
On 2024-01-16, Leonardo Bras <leobras@redhat.com> wrote:
> Well, at least in an PREEMPT_RT=y kernel I have found this same bug
> reproducing several times, and through the debugging that I went through I
> saw no mechanism for preventing it.
>
> This is one example of the bug:
> While writing to serial with serial8250_tx_chars in a irq_thread handler
> there is an interruption, and __report_bad_irq() tries to printk
> stuff to the console, and when printk goes down to
> serial8250_console_write() and tried to get the port->lock, which causes
> the "BUG: scheduling while atomic":
>
> [ 42.485878] irq 4: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll" option)
> [ 42.485886] BUG: scheduling while atomic: irq/4-ttyS0/751/0x00010002
> [ 42.485890] Modules linked in:
> [ 42.485892] Preemption disabled at:
> [ 42.485893] [<ffffffff8118ac80>] irq_enter_rcu+0x10/0x80
> [ 42.485919] CPU: 0 PID: 751 Comm: irq/4-ttyS0 Not tainted 6.7.0-rc6+ #6
This is 6.7.0-rc6+. How are you setting PREEMPT_RT?
> [ 42.485927] Hardware name: Red Hat KVM/RHEL, BIOS 1.16.3-1.el9 04/01/2014
> [ 42.485929] Call Trace:
> [ 42.485940] <IRQ>
> [ 42.485944] dump_stack_lvl+0x33/0x50
> [ 42.485976] __schedule_bug+0x89/0xa0
> [ 42.485991] schedule_debug.constprop.0+0xd1/0x120
> [ 42.485996] __schedule+0x50/0x690
> [ 42.486026] schedule_rtlock+0x1e/0x40
> [ 42.486029] rtlock_slowlock_locked+0xe7/0x2b0
> [ 42.486047] rt_spin_lock+0x41/0x60
> [ 42.486051] serial8250_console_write+0x1be/0x460
On PREEMPT_RT-patched kernel, serial8250_console_write() is not
compiled. So obviously you are not running a PREEMPT_RT-patched kernel.
> [ 42.486094] console_flush_all+0x18d/0x3c0
> [ 42.486111] console_unlock+0x6c/0xd0
Flushing on console_unlock() is the legacy method.
I assume you are using a mainline kernel with forced threading of
irqs. Mainline has many known problems with console printing, including
calling printk when the port->lock is held.
This has been discussed before [0].
> [ 42.486117] vprintk_emit+0x1d6/0x290
> [ 42.486122] _printk+0x58/0x80
> [ 42.486139] __report_bad_irq+0x26/0xc0
> [ 42.486147] note_interrupt+0x2a1/0x2f0
> [ 42.486155] handle_irq_event+0x84/0x90
> [ 42.486161] handle_edge_irq+0x9f/0x260
> [ 42.486168] __common_interrupt+0x68/0x100
> [ 42.486178] common_interrupt+0x9f/0xc0
> [ 42.486184] </IRQ>
If you want to fix any threaded irq problems relating to printk and
console drivers, please use the latest PREEMPT_RT patch series with
CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT enabled. This is the current work that is being
reviewed on LKML for mainline inclusion. Thanks!
John Ogness
[0] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87il5o32w9.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-01-18 9:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-01-16 7:36 [RESEND RFC PATCH v1 0/2] Fix serial console for PREEMPT_RT Leonardo Bras
2024-01-16 7:36 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v1 1/2] irq/spurious: Reset irqs_unhandled if an irq_thread handles one IRQ request Leonardo Bras
2024-01-17 22:08 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-17 22:46 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-18 9:24 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-16 7:37 ` [RESEND RFC PATCH v1 2/2] serial/8250: Avoid getting lock in RT atomic context Leonardo Bras
2024-01-16 8:48 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2024-01-16 18:21 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-18 9:01 ` John Ogness [this message]
2024-01-18 9:36 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-18 10:27 ` John Ogness
2024-01-18 17:50 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-18 10:33 ` Jiri Slaby
2024-01-18 17:57 ` Leonardo Bras
2024-01-17 22:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-01-17 23:18 ` Leonardo Bras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o7djaubq.fsf@jogness.linutronix.de \
--to=john.ogness@linutronix.de \
--cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
--cc=f.fainelli@gmail.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=jirislaby@kernel.org \
--cc=leobras@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-serial@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox