From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.43]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E8A664BA81 for ; Wed, 10 Jan 2024 15:18:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="kYjCyrI2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1704899899; x=1736435899; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=dJ5jpQk1QiaoPMF49QRCarI6rfbPtIjbuYVnb9lfisc=; b=kYjCyrI2FcA9+83egXPc/aqFxyv8Y7mWjEuwQy9ZlatibNlc2BCWOgDO QzQBGXnI+fYRlOuy84DkOBVymp/IqgCjsKhUtndXUXrK6KGT4xfsrsPdp Y4/Q6xczkvR6eqpxpYeYVSyLrRp4O5deAnTBVyYeptqZF9wm9ALiOEzbd D2y95a81GjuiYY+Nz4+zGwcbszc6sThkbAdx0eItneYMXkRWyj3INZRZb XlGNvzshSNPKid3TDbHJ7/INY37oMu/sNSisIlYBYkEKoMIQYreoYZmib i5DMONw0fxE3NzvJ0divvlzLjucu1Y6p1Wq+c2AQ86VoyKuFaC8JSbC4Z A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10948"; a="484732066" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,184,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="484732066" Received: from orsmga003.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.27]) by fmsmga105.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jan 2024 07:18:17 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10948"; a="731883180" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,184,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="731883180" Received: from fpallare-mobl3.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.36.240]) by orsmga003-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Jan 2024 07:18:14 -0800 From: Jani Nikula To: Lucas De Marchi , "Paul E. McKenney" Cc: Stephen Rothwell , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, intel-xe@lists.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [BUG] allmodconfig build error in next-20240108 In-Reply-To: <6r2zjqbs2g3hkt3uhnglwpboalwck5ye34b6gxzmhe4gae77g7@3bzqt4s7i2qb> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <45ad1d0f-a10f-483e-848a-76a30252edbe@paulmck-laptop> <20240109095757.1313b2d9@canb.auug.org.au> <341a4955-0cdd-48d0-bfbd-cc6f6f09df37@paulmck-laptop> <20240110081155.48bb0cbd@oak> <20240110095822.3ba3d979@canb.auug.org.au> <3d14049c-d44c-4b33-9933-0f96055b8a70@paulmck-laptop> <20240110160335.2bad7d54@oak> <3a10ef2b-acbe-4d80-805a-e947e15e5db3@paulmck-laptop> <6r2zjqbs2g3hkt3uhnglwpboalwck5ye34b6gxzmhe4gae77g7@3bzqt4s7i2qb> Date: Wed, 10 Jan 2024 17:18:11 +0200 Message-ID: <87o7dtusi4.fsf@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, Lucas De Marchi wrote: > [ This particular warning is broken on GCC11. In future changes it will > be moved to the normal C flags in the top level Makefile (out of > Makefile.extrawarn), but accounting for the compiler support. Just > remove it out of xe's forced extra warnings for now ] > Signed-off-by: Lucas De Marchi > > would you mind if I extend it to drivers/gpu/drm/i915/Makefile > in the same commit or would you prefer a separate one? I think I'd prefer separate patches for i915 and xe. And just remove the line instead of subdir-ccflags-$(call gcc-min-version, 120000) as linux-next handles it properly in the top level Makefile. BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel