From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 12760C001DF for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 10:09:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S232108AbjHBKJp (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2023 06:09:45 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:36984 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S231358AbjHBKJm (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Aug 2023 06:09:42 -0400 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.93]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF84910B for ; Wed, 2 Aug 2023 03:09:40 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1690970980; x=1722506980; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date: message-id:mime-version; bh=ONzB0seRRHiclo5dMgN21BC+phncruTYL7IKOB4VVg4=; b=MnxyaJCBTlFNNxaKjS6NkFTUZo6WEW5nA4x4AbytJgfwnaMtrG8JbuF8 9Cns7I+JDx/hOpqaioitixdcBmjKUtl94rxjIt/By++fGTfYlcbyKSZVJ 10w8Tzdbl8NzPbC5lTg/4A/WGixVyt04t3v3qyNEf2+WSGQK42hZccLK1 Lw3oVCZFdeb/H1FnJvEf+n+LxWTN4S//4IKF4nG7NzMNR/Y86D2t2J0/b lgVOG/PJ9k3b95WtwbvSh3fpCZDm4xsMgeNLm0nccXNejGpdDXAbbUyIv DBePlMmM3BCcF0P1gRIuQceqrUNVU/WgcANfuKjCG4jQaAXzULNkt7O55 A==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10789"; a="367003302" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,248,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="367003302" Received: from orsmga001.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.18]) by fmsmga102.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Aug 2023 03:09:40 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10789"; a="764167575" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.01,248,1684825200"; d="scan'208";a="764167575" Received: from osalyk-mobl1.ger.corp.intel.com (HELO localhost) ([10.252.62.215]) by orsmga001-auth.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Aug 2023 03:09:38 -0700 From: Jani Nikula To: Bagas Sanjaya , Ran Sun , alexander.deucher@amd.com, airlied@gmail.com, daniel@ffwll.ch Cc: amd-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/amd/pm: Clean up errors in smu73_discrete.h In-Reply-To: <2f4f53e2-b12b-c77c-e7cb-8c0436a209e5@gmail.com> Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo References: <20230801100024.8215-1-sunran001@208suo.com> <87cz07vvwu.fsf@intel.com> <2f4f53e2-b12b-c77c-e7cb-8c0436a209e5@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 02 Aug 2023 13:09:35 +0300 Message-ID: <87o7jpvjq8.fsf@intel.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, 02 Aug 2023, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: > On 01/08/2023 18:34, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 01 Aug 2023, Bagas Sanjaya wrote: >>> And it is unfortunate that you and @208suo.com people doesn't reply to >>> review comments (try searching lore.kernel.org) >> >> Essentially a one-way firehose of patches pointed at our general >> direction is not benefitial to the community. It's not participation, >> it's not co-operation. If the review gets ignored, why should we invest >> our time on *any* of the patches? >> >> > > Well, I guess this is the kind of "hey, some new orgs spam us tens > of trivial patches, then we review them as usual, but people from > that org are deaf in regards of our reviews (maybe deliberately?)". > The exact same situation happened last year with @cdjrlc.com > people, when they were notoriously known for spell-fixing and > redundant word fixing patches. Many of these patches were correct, > but some of them were not, triggering reviews requesting changes. > Yet, they also ignore the reviews. Since these emails, there have been 50+ more individual patches. :( BR, Jani. -- Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Graphics Center