From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Replace obsolete memalign() with posix_memalign()
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:02:50 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7nti9zp.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412111237.2007-1-wangdeming@inspur.com>
Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com> writes:
> memalign() is obsolete according to its manpage.
>
> Replace memalign() with posix_memalign() and remove malloc.h include
> that was there for memalign().
>
> As a pointer is passed into posix_memalign(), initialize *s to NULL
> to silence a warning about the function's return value being used as
> uninitialized (which is not valid anyway because the error is properly
> checked before p is returned).
The patch doesn't do that. There is no p?
I think you've copied the change log for a whole bunch of commits but
not updated them to be accurate for each change?
cheers
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> index 9055ebc484d0..f9c1f9cc2d32 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
> // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -#include <malloc.h>
> #include <stdlib.h>
> #include <string.h>
> #include <time.h>
> @@ -51,10 +50,11 @@ static void bench_test(char *s)
> static int testcase(void)
> {
> char *s;
> + int ret;
> unsigned long i;
>
> - s = memalign(128, SIZE);
> - if (!s) {
> + ret = posix_memalign((void **)&s, 128, SIZE);
> + if (ret < 0) {
> perror("memalign");
> exit(1);
> }
> --
> 2.27.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-04-12 12:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-04-12 11:12 [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Replace obsolete memalign() with posix_memalign() Deming Wang
2023-04-12 12:02 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-13 1:02 Deming Wang
2023-04-28 8:09 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o7nti9zp.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
--to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=wangdeming@inspur.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox