public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
To: Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>, shuah@kernel.org
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Replace obsolete memalign() with posix_memalign()
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2023 22:02:50 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7nti9zp.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230412111237.2007-1-wangdeming@inspur.com>

Deming Wang <wangdeming@inspur.com> writes:
> memalign() is obsolete according to its manpage.
>
> Replace memalign() with posix_memalign() and remove malloc.h include
> that was there for memalign().
>
> As a pointer is passed into posix_memalign(), initialize *s to NULL
> to silence a warning about the function's return value being used as
> uninitialized (which is not valid anyway because the error is properly
> checked before p is returned).

The patch doesn't do that. There is no p?

I think you've copied the change log for a whole bunch of commits but
not updated them to be accurate for each change?

cheers

> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> index 9055ebc484d0..f9c1f9cc2d32 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/stringloops/strlen.c
> @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
>  // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
> -#include <malloc.h>
>  #include <stdlib.h>
>  #include <string.h>
>  #include <time.h>
> @@ -51,10 +50,11 @@ static void bench_test(char *s)
>  static int testcase(void)
>  {
>  	char *s;
> +	int ret;
>  	unsigned long i;
>  
> -	s = memalign(128, SIZE);
> -	if (!s) {
> +	ret = posix_memalign((void **)&s, 128, SIZE);
> +	if (ret < 0) {
>  		perror("memalign");
>  		exit(1);
>  	}
> -- 
> 2.27.0

  reply	other threads:[~2023-04-12 12:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-04-12 11:12 [PATCH] selftests/powerpc: Replace obsolete memalign() with posix_memalign() Deming Wang
2023-04-12 12:02 ` Michael Ellerman [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2023-04-13  1:02 Deming Wang
2023-04-28  8:09 ` Muhammad Usama Anjum

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7nti9zp.fsf@mpe.ellerman.id.au \
    --to=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
    --cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
    --cc=shuah@kernel.org \
    --cc=wangdeming@inspur.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox