From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org, Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
Michael Kelley <mikelley@microsoft.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@redhat.com>,
linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 0/7] KVM: x86: Hyper-V invariant TSC control feature
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2022 16:43:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7szouyr.fsf@ovpn-194-185.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Y0nA0DCeh4IPmWMX@google.com>
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com> writes:
> On Thu, Oct 13, 2022, Vitaly Kuznetsov wrote:
>> Normally, genuine Hyper-V doesn't expose architectural invariant TSC
>> (CPUID.80000007H:EDX[8]) to its guests by default. A special PV MSR
>> (HV_X64_MSR_TSC_INVARIANT_CONTROL, 0x40000118) and corresponding CPUID
>> feature bit (CPUID.0x40000003.EAX[15]) were introduced. When bit 0 of the
>> PV MSR is set, invariant TSC bit starts to show up in CPUID. When the
>> feature is exposed to Hyper-V guests, reenlightenment becomes unneeded.
>>
>> Note: strictly speaking, KVM doesn't have to have the feature as exposing
>> raw invariant TSC bit (CPUID.80000007H:EDX[8]) also seems to work for
>> modern Windows versions. The feature is, however, tiny and straitforward
>> and gives additional flexibility so why not.
>>
>> Vitaly Kuznetsov (7):
>> x86/hyperv: Add HV_EXPOSE_INVARIANT_TSC define
>> KVM: x86: Add a KVM-only leaf for CPUID_8000_0007_EDX
>> KVM: x86: Hyper-V invariant TSC control
>> KVM: selftests: Rename 'msr->available' to 'msr->fault_exepected' in
>> hyperv_features test
>> KVM: selftests: Convert hyperv_features test to using
>> KVM_X86_CPU_FEATURE()
>> KVM: selftests: Test that values written to Hyper-V MSRs are preserved
>> KVM: selftests: Test Hyper-V invariant TSC control
>
> For the series, in case Paolo ends up grabbing this:
>
> Reviewed-by: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@google.com>
>
I completely forgot about this one! Any chance it can still be queueed
for 6.2? Thanks!
--
Vitaly
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-22 15:45 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-13 9:58 [PATCH v5 0/7] KVM: x86: Hyper-V invariant TSC control feature Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-10-13 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 1/7] x86/hyperv: Add HV_EXPOSE_INVARIANT_TSC define Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-10-13 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 2/7] KVM: x86: Add a KVM-only leaf for CPUID_8000_0007_EDX Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-10-13 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 3/7] KVM: x86: Hyper-V invariant TSC control Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-10-13 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 4/7] KVM: selftests: Rename 'msr->available' to 'msr->fault_exepected' in hyperv_features test Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-10-13 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 5/7] KVM: selftests: Convert hyperv_features test to using KVM_X86_CPU_FEATURE() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-10-13 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 6/7] KVM: selftests: Test that values written to Hyper-V MSRs are preserved Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-10-13 9:58 ` [PATCH v5 7/7] KVM: selftests: Test Hyper-V invariant TSC control Vitaly Kuznetsov
2022-10-14 20:04 ` [PATCH v5 0/7] KVM: x86: Hyper-V invariant TSC control feature Sean Christopherson
2022-11-22 15:43 ` Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2022-12-24 11:04 ` Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o7szouyr.fsf@ovpn-194-185.brq.redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-hyperv@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mikelley@microsoft.com \
--cc=mlevitsk@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox