public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
Cc: <paulmck@kernel.org>, <frederic@kernel.org>,
	<josh@joshtriplett.org>, <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	<mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>, <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	<joel@joelfernandes.org>, <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	<zhangfei.gao@foxmail.com>, <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
	<urezki@gmail.com>, <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com>,
	<pbonzini@redhat.com>, <mtosatti@redhat.com>,
	<eric.auger@redhat.com>, <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
	<zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>, <rcu@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] srcu: Reduce blocking agressiveness of expedited grace periods further
Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 09:25:56 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o7xlzey3.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220701031545.9868-1-quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>

Hi folks,

On Fri, 01 Jul 2022 04:15:45 +0100,
Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com> wrote:
> 
> Commit 640a7d37c3f4 ("srcu: Block less aggressively for expedited
> grace periods") highlights a problem where aggressively blocking
> SRCU expedited grace periods, as was introduced in commit
> 282d8998e997 ("srcu: Prevent expedited GPs and blocking readers
> from consuming CPU"), introduces ~2 minutes delay to the overall
> ~3.5 minutes boot time, when starting VMs with "-bios QEMU_EFI.fd"
> cmdline on qemu, which results in very high rate of memslots
> add/remove, which causes > ~6000 synchronize_srcu() calls for
> kvm->srcu SRCU instance.
> 
> Below table captures the experiments done by Zhangfei Gao and Shameer
> to measure the boottime impact with various values of non-sleeping
> per phase counts, with HZ_250 and preemption enabled:
> 
> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
> | SRCU_MAX_NODELAY_PHASE   | Boot time (s)  |
> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
> | 100                      | 30.053         |
> | 150                      | 25.151         |
> | 200                      | 20.704         |
> | 250                      | 15.748         |
> | 500                      | 11.401         |
> | 1000                     | 11.443         |
> | 10000                    | 11.258         |
> | 1000000                  | 11.154         |
> +──────────────────────────+────────────────+
> 
> Analysis on the experiment results showed improved boot time
> with non blocking delays close to one jiffy duration. This
> was also seen when number of per-phase iterations were scaled
> to one jiffy.
> 
> So, this change scales per-grace-period phase number of non-sleeping
> polls, such that, non-sleeping polls are done for one jiffy. In addition
> to this, srcu_get_delay() call in srcu_gp_end(), which is used to calculate
> the delay used for scheduling callbacks, is replaced with the check for
> expedited grace period. This is done, to schedule cbs for completed expedited
> grace periods immediately, which results in improved boot time seen in
> experiments. Testing done by Marc and Zhangfei confirms that this change recovers
> most of the performance degradation in boottime; for CONFIG_HZ_250 configuration,
> boottime improves from 3m50s to 41s on Marc's setup; and from 2m40s to ~9.7s
> on Zhangfei's setup.
> 
> In addition to the changes to default per phase delays, this change
> adds 3 new kernel parameters - srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay,
> srcutree.srcu_max_nodelay_phase, srcutree.srcu_retry_check_delay.
> This allows users to configure the srcu grace period scanning delays,
> depending on their system configuration requirements.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <quic_neeraju@quicinc.com>
> Tested-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
> Tested-by: Zhangfei Gao <zhangfei.gao@linaro.org>

Is there any chance for this fix to make it into 5.19? The regression
is significant enough on low-end systems, and I'd rather see it
addressed.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-07-19  8:26 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-07-01  3:15 [PATCH v3] srcu: Reduce blocking agressiveness of expedited grace periods further Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-07-01  4:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-01  5:04   ` Neeraj Upadhyay
2022-07-01 13:46     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-19  8:25 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2022-07-19 17:15   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-07-20  7:19     ` Marc Zyngier
2022-07-20 18:13       ` Paul E. McKenney

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o7xlzey3.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=eric.auger@redhat.com \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=mtosatti@redhat.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=quic_neeraju@quicinc.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    --cc=shameerali.kolothum.thodi@huawei.com \
    --cc=urezki@gmail.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@foxmail.com \
    --cc=zhangfei.gao@linaro.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox