From: Florian Weimer <fweimer@redhat.com>
To: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>
Cc: Chris Kennelly <ckennelly@google.com>,
Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>, Peter Oskolkov <posk@posk.io>,
libc-alpha <libc-alpha@sourceware.org>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: Aligning tcmalloc with glibc 2.35 rseq ABI
Date: Wed, 02 Feb 2022 16:01:15 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o83pxqh0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <770517862.27112.1643807335312.JavaMail.zimbra@efficios.com> (Mathieu Desnoyers's message of "Wed, 2 Feb 2022 08:08:55 -0500 (EST)")
* Mathieu Desnoyers:
> More to the point: is ptrdiff_t the correct type here ? I think so.
> Do we want to revert the ABI and wait another 6 months before we
> bring back rseq into glibc just for this ? I'm not sure this limitation
> justifies it.
>
> So if there is a quick way to fix that before the official 2.35 release,
> I'm all for it, otherwise I cannot say that __rseq_offset being an "int"
> rather than a "ptrdiff_t" will make much real-life difference (unless
> I'm proven wrong). But we will be stuck with this quirk forever.
I'm going to post a patch. It's fairly small.
Thanks,
Florian
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-02-02 15:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-02-01 14:58 Aligning tcmalloc with glibc 2.35 rseq ABI Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-01 20:33 ` Chris Kennelly
[not found] ` <87mtja1fuz.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
[not found] ` <875ypx1x0d.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com>
2022-02-02 11:36 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-02 13:08 ` Mathieu Desnoyers
2022-02-02 15:01 ` Florian Weimer [this message]
2022-02-02 17:31 ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-02-02 22:28 ` Carlos O'Donell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o83pxqh0.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com \
--to=fweimer@redhat.com \
--cc=ckennelly@google.com \
--cc=libc-alpha@sourceware.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=posk@posk.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox