public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Iain Hunter <drhunter95@gmail.com>
Cc: lothar.felten@gmail.com, iain@hunterembedded.co.uk,
	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@kernel.org>,
	Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@metafoo.de>,
	Alexandru Ardelean <alexandru.ardelean@analog.com>,
	Gwendal Grignou <gwendal@chromium.org>,
	Matt Ranostay <matt.ranostay@konsulko.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Zeng Tao <prime.zeng@hisilicon.com>,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] workaround regression in ina2xx introduced by cb47755725da("time: Prevent undefined behaviour in timespec64_to_ns()")
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2021 23:18:42 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o88favd9.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210926171711.194901-1-drhunter95@gmail.com>

On Sun, Sep 26 2021 at 18:16, Iain Hunter wrote:
> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
> @@ -817,10 +817,10 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *data)
>  		 */
>  		do {
>  			timespec64_add_ns(&next, 1000 * sampling_us);
> -			delta = timespec64_sub(next, now);
> -			delay_us = div_s64(timespec64_to_ns(&delta), 1000);
> -		} while (delay_us <= 0);
> +		} while (timespec64_compare(&next, &now) < 0);
>  
> +		delta = timespec64_sub(next, now);
> +		delay_us = div_s64(timespec64_to_ns(&delta), 1000);

This whole timespec dance does not make any sense and can be completely
avoided by using just scalar nanoseconds. Untested patch below.

Thanks,

        tglx
---
--- a/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/adc/ina2xx-adc.c
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
 	struct ina2xx_chip_info *chip = iio_priv(indio_dev);
 	int sampling_us = SAMPLING_PERIOD(chip);
 	int ret;
-	struct timespec64 next, now, delta;
+	ktime_t next, now, delta;
 	s64 delay_us;
 
 	/*
@@ -785,7 +785,7 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
 	if (!chip->allow_async_readout)
 		sampling_us -= 200;
 
-	ktime_get_ts64(&next);
+	next = ktime_get();
 
 	do {
 		while (!chip->allow_async_readout) {
@@ -798,7 +798,7 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
 			 * reset the reference timestamp.
 			 */
 			if (ret == 0)
-				ktime_get_ts64(&next);
+				next = ktime_get();
 			else
 				break;
 		}
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
 		if (ret < 0)
 			return ret;
 
-		ktime_get_ts64(&now);
+		now = ktime_get();
 
 		/*
 		 * Advance the timestamp for the next poll by one sampling
@@ -816,11 +816,10 @@ static int ina2xx_capture_thread(void *d
 		 * multiple times, i.e. samples are dropped.
 		 */
 		do {
-			timespec64_add_ns(&next, 1000 * sampling_us);
-			delta = timespec64_sub(next, now);
-			delay_us = div_s64(timespec64_to_ns(&delta), 1000);
-		} while (delay_us <= 0);
+			next = ktime_add_us(next, sampling_us);
+		} while (next <= now);
 
+		delay_us = ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(next, now));
 		usleep_range(delay_us, (delay_us * 3) >> 1);
 
 	} while (!kthread_should_stop());



  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-26 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-26 17:16 [PATCH v3] workaround regression in ina2xx introduced by cb47755725da("time: Prevent undefined behaviour in timespec64_to_ns()") Iain Hunter
2021-09-26 21:18 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2021-09-30 16:18   ` Jonathan Cameron
2021-09-30 16:20     ` Jonathan Cameron

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o88favd9.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=alexandru.ardelean@analog.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=drhunter95@gmail.com \
    --cc=gwendal@chromium.org \
    --cc=iain@hunterembedded.co.uk \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=lars@metafoo.de \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lothar.felten@gmail.com \
    --cc=matt.ranostay@konsulko.com \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox