public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
	kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters'
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:12:26 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8ehmayd.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210413200057.ankb4e26ytgal7ev@archlinux-ax161>

On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 21:00:57 +0100,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:

[...]

> I just ran into this again. It is not a clang specific issue, it
> reproduces quite easily with arm64 defconfig minus CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> and gcc 10.3.0:
> 
> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c: In function 'kvm_perf_init':
> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'perf_num_counters'; did you mean 'dec_mm_counter'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
>    58 |  if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0)
>       |                                    ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>       |                                    dec_mm_counter
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
> 
> I am not sure what the cleanest solution would be for providing a static
> inline version of perf_num_counters() would be, as only arm64 actually
> uses it (sh and s390 define it but it does not appear to be used) but it
> is only available through CONFIG_ARM_PMU instead of just
> CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS like the other two architectures mentioned above.

As you point out, KVM/arm64 is the only user of perf_num_counters()
across the whole kernel. The whole oprofile subsystem has been
removed, so maybe a a bigger cleanup is in order.

I'll post something shortly.

Thanks,

	M.

-- 
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.

  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-14 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-26 12:27 arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters' kernel test robot
2021-04-13 20:00 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-14 10:12   ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-04-14 10:16   ` Alexandru Elisei
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-26  3:54 kernel test robot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87o8ehmayd.wl-maz@kernel.org \
    --to=maz@kernel.org \
    --cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
    --cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox