From: Marc Zyngier <maz@kernel.org>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>,
kbuild-all@lists.01.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@arm.com>
Subject: Re: arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters'
Date: Wed, 14 Apr 2021 11:12:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o8ehmayd.wl-maz@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210413200057.ankb4e26ytgal7ev@archlinux-ax161>
On Tue, 13 Apr 2021 21:00:57 +0100,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
[...]
> I just ran into this again. It is not a clang specific issue, it
> reproduces quite easily with arm64 defconfig minus CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS
> and gcc 10.3.0:
>
> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c: In function 'kvm_perf_init':
> arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function
> 'perf_num_counters'; did you mean 'dec_mm_counter'?
> [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration]
> 58 | if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARM_PMU) && perf_num_counters() > 0)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | dec_mm_counter
> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors
>
> I am not sure what the cleanest solution would be for providing a static
> inline version of perf_num_counters() would be, as only arm64 actually
> uses it (sh and s390 define it but it does not appear to be used) but it
> is only available through CONFIG_ARM_PMU instead of just
> CONFIG_PERF_EVENTS like the other two architectures mentioned above.
As you point out, KVM/arm64 is the only user of perf_num_counters()
across the whole kernel. The whole oprofile subsystem has been
removed, so maybe a a bigger cleanup is in order.
I'll post something shortly.
Thanks,
M.
--
Without deviation from the norm, progress is not possible.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-04-14 10:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-03-26 12:27 arch/arm64/kvm/perf.c:58:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'perf_num_counters' kernel test robot
2021-04-13 20:00 ` Nathan Chancellor
2021-04-14 10:12 ` Marc Zyngier [this message]
2021-04-14 10:16 ` Alexandru Elisei
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2021-03-26 3:54 kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o8ehmayd.wl-maz@kernel.org \
--to=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=alexandru.elisei@arm.com \
--cc=clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox