From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Jürg Billeter" <j@bitron.ch>, "Oleg Nesterov" <oleg@redhat.com>,
"Linus Torvalds" <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Michael Kerrisk" <mtk.manpages@gmail.com>,
"Filipe Brandenburger" <filbranden@google.com>,
"David Wilcox" <davidvsthegiant@gmail.com>,
"Adam H . Peterson" <alphaetapi@hotmail.com>,
hansecke@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RESEND PATCH] prctl: add PR_[GS]ET_PDEATHSIG_PROC
Date: Mon, 02 Oct 2017 22:25:32 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87o9pogbf7.fsf@xmission.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20171002162041.a7cefe8af71327b8becd2347@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Mon, 2 Oct 2017 16:20:41 -0700")
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2017 14:30:58 +0200 Jürg Billeter <j@bitron.ch> wrote:
>
>> PR_SET_PDEATHSIG sets a parent death signal that the calling process
>> will get when its parent thread dies, even when the result of getppid()
>> doesn't change because the calling process is reparented to a different
>> thread in the same parent process. When managing multiple processes, a
>> process-based parent death signal is much more useful. E.g., to avoid
>> stray child processes.
>>
>> PR_SET_PDEATHSIG_PROC sets a process-based death signal. Unlike
>> PR_SET_PDEATHSIG, this is inherited across fork to allow killing a whole
>> subtree without race conditions.
>>
>> This can be used for sandboxing when combined with a seccomp filter.
>>
>> There have been previous attempts to support this by changing the
>> behavior of PR_SET_PDEATHSIG. However, that would break existing
>> applications. See https://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=117621804801689
>> and https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43300
>
> Are Eric and Oleg OK with this?
>
> A prctl manpage update will be needed, please (cc linux-api).
It makes for an interesting way of killing a process tree. The domino
effect.
I believe the rational for adding a new prctl.
The code where it calls group_send_sig_info is buggy for pdeath_signal.
And it no less buggy for this new case. There is no point to check
permissions when sending a signal to yourself. Especially this signal
gets cleared during exec with a change of permissions.
I would recommend using:
do_send_sig_info(p->signal->pdeath_signal_proc, SEND_SIG_NOINFO, p, true);
Perhaps with a comment saying that no permission check is needed when
sending a signal to yourself.
I don't know what I think about inherit over fork, and the whole tree
killing thing. Except when the signal is SIGKILL I don't know if that
code does what is intended. So I am a little leary of it.
Eric
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-03 3:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-09-09 9:40 [PATCH] prctl: add PR_[GS]ET_PDEATHSIG_PROC Jürg Billeter
2017-09-12 17:05 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-09-12 18:54 ` Jürg Billeter
2017-09-13 17:11 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-09-13 17:26 ` Jürg Billeter
2017-09-13 17:48 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-09-29 12:30 ` [RESEND PATCH] " Jürg Billeter
2017-10-02 23:20 ` Andrew Morton
2017-10-03 3:25 ` Eric W. Biederman [this message]
2017-10-03 6:45 ` Jürg Billeter
2017-10-03 14:46 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-03 16:10 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-03 16:36 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-03 17:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-03 19:30 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-03 20:02 ` Linus Torvalds
2017-10-03 20:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-03 17:00 ` Jürg Billeter
2017-10-03 17:40 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-03 17:47 ` Jürg Billeter
2017-10-03 19:05 ` Eric W. Biederman
2017-10-05 16:27 ` Oleg Nesterov
2017-10-08 17:47 ` Jürg Billeter
2017-10-09 16:32 ` Eric W. Biederman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87o9pogbf7.fsf@xmission.com \
--to=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alphaetapi@hotmail.com \
--cc=davidvsthegiant@gmail.com \
--cc=filbranden@google.com \
--cc=hansecke@gmail.com \
--cc=j@bitron.ch \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mtk.manpages@gmail.com \
--cc=oleg@redhat.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox