From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932256AbdA3Or0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:47:26 -0500 Received: from mail.free-electrons.com ([62.4.15.54]:52981 "EHLO mail.free-electrons.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932136AbdA3OrM (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Jan 2017 09:47:12 -0500 From: Gregory CLEMENT To: Chris Packham Cc: Stephen Boyd , Linus Walleij , "linux\@armlinux.org.uk" , "linux-arm-kernel\@lists.infradead.org" , Rob Herring , Mark Rutland , Michael Turquette , Jason Cooper , Andrew Lunn , Sebastian Hesselbarth , Geert Uytterhoeven , Chris Brand , Florian Fainelli , "Arnd Bergmann" , Thierry Reding , Sudeep Holla , Juri Lelli , Thomas Petazzoni , Laxman Dewangan , Kalyan Kinthada , "devicetree\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-clk\@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-gpio\@vger.kernel.org" Subject: Re: [PATCHv5 0/5] Support for Marvell switches with integrated CPUs References: <20170127032546.14657-1-chris.packham@alliedtelesis.co.nz> <87wpdgwj72.fsf@free-electrons.com> <20170127184745.GD8801@codeaurora.org> Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2017 15:40:31 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Chris Packham's message of "Sun, 29 Jan 2017 20:30:34 +0000") Message-ID: <87o9yotxuo.fsf@free-electrons.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Chris, On dim., janv. 29 2017, Chris Packham wrote: > On 28/01/17 07:47, Stephen Boyd wrote: >> On 01/27, Gregory CLEMENT wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> On ven., janv. 27 2017, Chris Packham wrote: >>> >>>> The 98DX3236, 98DX3336 and 98DX4251 are a set of switch ASICs with >>>> integrated CPUs. They CPU block is common within these product lines and >>>> (as far as I can tell/have been told) is based on the Armada XP. There >>>> are a few differences due to the fact they have to squeeze the CPU into >>>> the same package as the switch. >>>> >>>> I've rebased this series against linux-pinctrl/devel to get access to >>>> mvebu_mmio_mpp_ctrl. Everything else still applies cleanly to >>>> v4.10.0-rc5. >>> >>> Just to let you know that I plan to apply the 3 arm patch once Chris >>> will have sent the new series with the minor fixes I asked on patch 3. >>> >>> I already applied them in the for-next branch to benefit of some build >>> test coverage. >>> >>> Stephen, >>> >>> you gave your Acked-by on the first patch, but don't you plan to apply >>> it on the clk branch? >> >> It must have not been clear if I should apply it, hence the ack. >> I'll apply it now. >> > > Sorry my bad. I need all 5 together in one place to actually test the > series. The 5 patches should be available soon (if it is not already the case), in the linux-next branch. The clk patch is already there, the 3 arm patch have been merged in my mvebu/for-next branch, and the pinctrl patch is about to be merged in the pinctrl/for-next branch. Gregory > > I wasn't sure whether the series should go through mvebu with Acks from > clk and pinctrl or if things should go to the separate maintainers and > come together when they hit the main linux repo. Up until the latest > pinctrl change either approach would have worked. -- Gregory Clement, Free Electrons Kernel, drivers, real-time and embedded Linux development, consulting, training and support. http://free-electrons.com