From: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be>
To: "Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
gabriel@krisman.be, hch@lst.de, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] genirq/affinity: fix node generation from cpumask
Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 23:05:51 -0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oa0erogg.fsf@collabora.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1481738472-2671-1-git-send-email-gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (Guilherme G. Piccoli's message of "Wed, 14 Dec 2016 16:01:12 -0200")
"Guilherme G. Piccoli" <gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
> Commit 34c3d9819fda ("genirq/affinity: Provide smarter irq spreading
> infrastructure") introduced a better IRQ spreading mechanism, taking
> account of the available NUMA nodes in the machine.
>
> Problem is that the algorithm of retrieving the nodemask iterates
> "linearly" based on the number of online nodes - some architectures
> present non-linear node distribution among the nodemask, like PowerPC.
> If this is the case, the algorithm lead to a wrong node count number
> and therefore to a bad/incomplete IRQ affinity distribution.
>
> For example, this problem were found in a machine with 128 CPUs and two
> nodes, namely nodes 0 and 8 (instead of 0 and 1, if it was linearly
> distributed). This led to a wrong affinity distribution which then led to
> a bad mq allocation for nvme driver.
>
> Finally, we take the opportunity to fix a comment regarding the affinity
> distribution when we have _more_ nodes than vectors.
Thanks for taking care of this so quickly, Guilherme.
Reviewed-by: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <gabriel@krisman.be>
--
Gabriel Krisman Bertazi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-12-15 1:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-12-14 18:01 [PATCH] genirq/affinity: fix node generation from cpumask Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-12-14 23:24 ` Gavin Shan
2016-12-15 9:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2016-12-15 12:38 ` Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-12-15 1:05 ` Gabriel Krisman Bertazi [this message]
2016-12-15 8:54 ` Christoph Hellwig
2016-12-15 11:37 ` [tip:irq/urgent] genirq/affinity: Fix " tip-bot for Guilherme G. Piccoli
2016-12-15 12:34 ` [PATCH] genirq/affinity: fix " Balbir Singh
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oa0erogg.fsf@collabora.co.uk \
--to=gabriel@krisman.be \
--cc=gpiccoli@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox