From: Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
"netdev\@vger.kernel.org" <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RFC] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Pre-initialize err in mv88e6xxx_port_bridge_join()
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2016 14:35:14 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oa8xtu3h.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAMuHMdVfYTx3CCa0GnqmcWHBQPYZZUYZQz1hOOaUjgXFmhVP3w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi Geert,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
> Hi Vivien,
>
> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 7:31 PM, Vivien Didelot
> <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>> On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 5:03 PM, Vivien Didelot
>>> <vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com> wrote:
>>>> Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org> writes:
>>>>> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c: In function ‘mv88e6xxx_port_bridge_join’:
>>>>> drivers/net/dsa/mv88e6xxx.c:2184: warning: ‘err’ may be used uninitialized in this function
>>>>
>>>> Interesting, I don't have those warnings on 207afda1b5036009...
>>>
>>> It depends on the compiler version (still using 4.1.2) and options.
>>>
>>>>> If netdev_notifier_changeupper_info.upper_dev is ever NULL, the bridge
>>>>> parameter will be NULL too, and the function will return an
>>>>> uninitialized value.
>>>>>
>>>>> Pre-initialize err to zero to fix this.
>>>>>
>>>>> Fixes: 207afda1b5036009 ("net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: share the same default FDB")
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> Can this actually happen?
>>>>
>>>> bridge cannot be NULL here. Also ps->ports[port].bridge_dev is assigned
>>>> to it before entering the for loop, so _mv88e6xxx_port_based_vlan_map
>>>> will be called at least for this port.
>>>
>>> But there's no way the compiler can know that...
>>
>> Or maybe it can in new configurations. Anyway, this fix doesn't hurt,
>> with a relevant commit message, I'd ack it.
>
> What would you consider a relevant commit message?
bridge being NULL is not the reason why err can eventually get returned
uninitialized. The GCC version would be great too, I have no such
warning here with 5.3.0.
Thanks,
-v
prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-25 18:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-25 7:52 [PATCH] [RFC] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: Pre-initialize err in mv88e6xxx_port_bridge_join() Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-25 15:03 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-04-25 16:34 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-25 17:31 ` Vivien Didelot
2016-04-25 17:53 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2016-04-25 18:35 ` Vivien Didelot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87oa8xtu3h.fsf@ketchup.mtl.sfl \
--to=vivien.didelot@savoirfairelinux.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox