From: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Cc: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ktest: remove the misleading $buildonly and introduce $laststep.
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:50:53 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ob1dvtr6.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ppltvu37.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
At Tue, 11 Mar 2014 20:43:40 +0900,
Satoru Takeuchi wrote:
>
> At Mon, 10 Mar 2014 12:13:00 -0400,
> Steven Rostedt wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, 09 Mar 2014 23:36:49 +0900
> > Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > From: Satoru Takeuchi <satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com>
> > >
> > > Each test of ktest consists of the following steps.
> > >
> > > build -> install -> boot -> run user defined tests.
> > >
> > > $buildonly means not whether the test is build onlyor not. Actually
> > > this variable mean the last step of the test as follows.
> > >
> > > 0: boot or more
> > > 1: build
> > > 2: install
> > >
> > > AS you can see, these are random numeric literals. In addition,
> > > there is no explanation about them.
> > >
> > > To improve readability, introduce $laststep instead of $buildonly.
> > > This variable means the last step of the test as follows.
> > >
> > > STEP_BUILD (=0): build
> > > STEP_INSTALL (=1): install
> > > STEP_BOOT_OR_MORE (=2): boot or more
> >
> > Nice clean up. But there's some bugs in this patch.
> >
> >
> > > @@ -649,26 +651,20 @@ sub set_value {
> > >
> > > my $prvalue = process_variables($rvalue);
> > >
> > > - if ($buildonly && $lvalue =~ /^TEST_TYPE(\[.*\])?$/ && $prvalue ne "build") {
> > > - # Note if a test is something other than build, then we
> > > - # will need other manditory options.
> > > - if ($prvalue ne "install") {
> > > - # for bisect, we need to check BISECT_TYPE
> > > - if ($prvalue ne "bisect") {
> > > - $buildonly = 0;
> >
> > When prvalue ne "bisect" we set it to boot or more.
> >
> > > + if ($laststep <= STEP_INSTALL) {
> > > + if ($lvalue =~ /^TEST_TYPE(\[.*\])?$/ && $prvalue ne "build") {
> > > + # Note if a test is something other than build, then we
> > > + # will need other manditory options.
> > > + if ($prvalue eq "install") {
> > > + # install still limits some manditory options.
> > > + $laststep = STEP_INSTALL;
> > > + } elsif ($prvalue ne "bisect") {
> > > + # for bisect, we need to check BISECT_TYPE
> > > + $laststep = STEP_BUILD;
> >
> > Here you set it back to build.
> >
> > > }
> > > - } else {
> > > - # install still limits some manditory options.
> > > - $buildonly = 2;
> > > - }
> > > - }
> > > -
> > > - if ($buildonly && $lvalue =~ /^BISECT_TYPE(\[.*\])?$/ && $prvalue ne "build") {
> > > - if ($prvalue ne "install") {
> > > - $buildonly = 0;
> > > - } else {
> > > - # install still limits some manditory options.
> > > - $buildonly = 2;
> > > + } elsif ($lvalue =~ /^BISECT_TYPE(\[.*\])?$/ &&
> > > + $prvalue ne "build") {
> > > + $laststep = ($prvalue eq "install") ? STEP_INSTALL : STEP_BUILD;
> >
> > Here too.
> >
> > In fact, with this patch, we never set to boot or more.
>
> Sorry, my code review and test are insufficient.
>
> >
> > Also, you can make it even cleaner, by having the outer if condition be:
> >
> > if ($laststep <= STEP_INSTALL && $prvalue ne "build")
> >
> > And remove the prvalue check from the inner conditions.
>
> Thank you fo your comment.
>
> >
> > Just send a fix of this patch, I have already pulled in the other two.
>
> Thanks, I'll do.
>
> > I just need to test them for a bit before I push them to my kernel.org
> > repo. I don't actually have a test suite for ktest. My testing is that
> > I use ktest on a daily basis, and I just use the latest devel ktest for
> > my daily activities. If something breaks, I usually notice, unless it's
> > affects something I haven't done recently (like a bisect).
>
> I'll make and send my testsuite later. I considers that
> tools/testing/ktest/example is suitable to place it.
Sorry, actually tools/testing/ktest/tests.
.../examples/ is for examples for configs file as written in examples/README.
Thanks,
Satoru
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-03-11 11:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-03-09 14:29 [PATCH 1/3] ktest: add 2nd parameter of run_command() to set the redirect target file Satoru Takeuchi
2014-03-09 14:32 ` [PATCH 2/3] ktest: Some cleanup for improving readability Satoru Takeuchi
2014-03-09 14:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] ktest: remove the misleading $buildonly and introduce $laststep Satoru Takeuchi
2014-03-10 16:13 ` Steven Rostedt
2014-03-11 11:43 ` Satoru Takeuchi
2014-03-11 11:50 ` Satoru Takeuchi [this message]
2014-03-11 19:56 ` Steven Rostedt
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ob1dvtr6.wl%satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com \
--to=satoru.takeuchi@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox