From: "Compostella\, Jeremy" <jeremy.compostella@gmail.com>
To: <devel@driverdev.osuosl.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "Gross, Mark" <mark.gross@intel.com>,
"Ernst, Eric" <eric.ernst@intel.com>, "Arve" <arve@android.com>,
"Dan Carpenter" <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>,
"Mirsal Ennaime" <mirsal@mirsal.fr>
Subject: [PATCH] Android / binder: Fix broken walk in binder_node_release()
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2014 14:22:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ob21x6j6.fsf@tldlab276.tl.intel.com> (raw)
From: "Compostella, Jeremy" <jeremy.compostella@intel.com>
This bug can manifest itself in several situations, here is the one that made me
hunt it last week:
When an Android device is encrypted, Android starts all the init services of
core and main levels, then it asks for the password and checks it trying to
mount /data. On success, it kills all the main services, mount /data and
restart all the main services.
Unfortunately, on restart of those main services we observe :
DisplayManager Could not get display information from display manager.
DisplayManager android.os.DeadObjectException
DisplayManager at android.os.BinderProxy.transact(Native Method)
DisplayManager at android.hardware.display.IDisplayManager$Stub$Proxy.getDisplayInfo(IDisplayManager.java:228)
DisplayManager at android.hardware.display.DisplayManagerGlobal.getDisplayInfo(DisplayManagerGlobal.java:117)
DisplayManager at android.hardware.display.DisplayManagerGlobal.getCompatibleDisplay(DisplayManagerGlobal.java:176)
DisplayManager at android.app.ResourcesManager.getDisplayMetricsLocked(ResourcesManager.java:96)
DisplayManager at android.app.ResourcesManager.getDisplayMetricsLocked(ResourcesManager.java:74)
[...]
Which means that the 'display' service is registered into the service_manager
but point to a dead object (understand died process). This error is the first
one of a chain of missing "remote" objects causing the death of processes until
the system can recovery by itself a few seconds later.
The binder driver allows a "process" to ask a notification when a particular
reference die. In that case, the binder driver associate a death object to this
reference.
When the system_server process died, the file descriptor to the binder driver is
automatically released and the binder driver will walk all the references
associated to this process to unallocate them. When such a reference has a
death object associated it will execute a task to notify the death to the
previously register process usually the service_manager process.
The bug is that this walk on all the references is broken due to an
unfornate refactoring made by the following patch :
commit 008fa749e0fe5b2fffd20b7fe4891bb80d072c6a
Author: Mirsal Ennaime <mirsal@mirsal.fr>
Date: Tue Mar 12 11:41:59 2013 +0100
which break the loop if the current reference does not have a death object
instead of continuing to the next reference. As a consequence all the next
references will not be correctly unallocate and no death notification will be
sent for them.
Signed-off-by: Jeremy Compostella <jeremy.compostella@intel.com>
---
drivers/staging/android/binder.c | 3 +--
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/android/binder.c b/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
index eaec1da..1432d95 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/android/binder.c
@@ -2904,7 +2904,7 @@ static int binder_node_release(struct binder_node *node, int refs)
refs++;
if (!ref->death)
- goto out;
+ continue;
death++;
@@ -2917,7 +2917,6 @@ static int binder_node_release(struct binder_node *node, int refs)
BUG();
}
-out:
binder_debug(BINDER_DEBUG_DEAD_BINDER,
"node %d now dead, refs %d, death %d\n",
node->debug_id, refs, death);
--
1.7.10.4
next reply other threads:[~2014-02-20 13:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-02-20 13:22 Compostella, Jeremy [this message]
2014-02-20 13:34 ` [PATCH] Android / binder: Fix broken walk in binder_node_release() Dan Carpenter
2014-02-21 20:30 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2014-02-20 10:35 Compostella, Jeremy
2014-02-20 10:47 ` Dan Carpenter
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ob21x6j6.fsf@tldlab276.tl.intel.com \
--to=jeremy.compostella@gmail.com \
--cc=arve@android.com \
--cc=dan.carpenter@oracle.com \
--cc=devel@driverdev.osuosl.org \
--cc=eric.ernst@intel.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.gross@intel.com \
--cc=mirsal@mirsal.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox