From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner+w=401wt.eu-S964983AbXBLRK3@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
	id S964983AbXBLRK3 (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:10:29 -0500
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S964984AbXBLRK3
	(ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel-outgoing>);
	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:10:29 -0500
Received: from [217.111.56.2] ([217.111.56.2]:24112 "EHLO semtex.sncag.com"
	rhost-flags-FAIL-FAIL-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
	id S964983AbXBLRK2 (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
	Mon, 12 Feb 2007 12:10:28 -0500
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>
Cc: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@sncag.com>, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
       Oleg Verych <olecom@flower.upol.cz>,
       Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
       Adrian Bunk <bunk@stusta.de>
Subject: Re: unfixed regression in 2.6.20-rc6 (since 2.6.19)
In-Reply-To: <20070212163759.GA15603@kroah.com> (Greg KH's message of "Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:37:59 -0800")
References: <877ivb2kvc.fsf@semtex.sncag.com>
	<20070125185101.GA26279@kroah.com> <87y7nq131x.fsf@semtex.sncag.com>
	<20070126174828.GA28890@kroah.com> <87d54z1dhb.fsf@semtex.sncag.com>
	<slrnerqjit.f71.olecom@flower.upol.cz>
	<20070129234340.GA6881@kroah.com> <87k5z4za4l.fsf@semtex.sncag.com>
	<20070204043935.GA8829@kroah.com> <87abzj5tz5.fsf@semtex.sncag.com>
	<20070212163759.GA15603@kroah.com>
From: Rainer Weikusat <rainer.weikusat@sncag.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 18:10:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87odnzi9p0.fsf@semtex.sncag.com>
User-Agent: Gnus/5.1008 (Gnus v5.10.8) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 03:30:22PM +0100, Rainer Weikusat wrote:

[...]

>> If you want to fix it only if you can claim to have written the code,
>> fine.
>
> I do not claim I have rewritten the code, if you look, you get full
> authorship credit for this fix, I just say I restructured it a bit.

You have rewritten it to match set of popular beliefs I consider to be
misguided. This means _you_ are the author of this code and all I can
to is to basically accept that you have the power to force your
beliefs on others and I haven't. So be it. Could this be the end of
this useless discussion?