public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe Troin <phil@fifi.org>
To: Sheo Shanker Prasad <ssp@creativeresearch.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Disturbing wide variation in execution time
Date: 07 Jul 2005 11:46:38 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87oe9eo3n5.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200507062344.53615.ssp@creativeresearch.org>

Sheo Shanker Prasad <ssp@creativeresearch.org> writes:

> I will appreciate your help in eliminating a disturbing wide
> variation (by a factors of 2 to 2.5) in the execution time of a test
> (execution benchmark) program under identical conditions even when
> the machine is freshly started (rebooted) and no other user program
> is running (not even e-mail or Internet browser).
> 
> I have a dual Opteron 250 (2.4 GHz) running SuSE 9.3 Pro & Linux
> version 2.6.11.4-21.7-smp (geeko@buildhost) (gcc version 3.3.5
> 20050117 (prerelease) (SUSE Linux)) #1 SMP Thu Jun 2 14:23:14 UTC
> 2005. The motherboard is Tyan Thunder K8W (S2885 ANRF) with AMI BIOS
> 
> The machine has 4GB of PC3200 DDR RAM, two dimms on each CPU.
> 
> The original machine bought from a vendor about 6 months ago. At
> that time it was running SuSE 9.1 Pro and the execution time for the
> same test program was consistently the same (around 2m 37s +/- a few
> %). Then the mother board failed and the machine went totally
> dead. The vendor then replaced the failed motherboard with a new
> Tyan Thunder K8W and installed the SuSE 9.3. I am not sure whether
> or not the AMI BIOS was also replaced.
> 
> When the repaired machine was started, I began to notice the
> disturbing wide variation and the frequect significant slow down of
> the machine as exhibited by the factor of 2 to 2.5 increased
> execution time of the test program as described above.  Sometimes it
> would be quite fast (executing at the original 2m 40s) and sometime
> a factor of 2.5 slow, and sometimes with speed in between.

8< snip >8

 1. Are you running an i386 kernel or an x86_64 kernel?

 2. Which BIOS version?

 3. Is node interleaving enabled in the BIOS?

Phil.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2005-07-07 18:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2005-07-07  6:44 Disturbing wide variation in execution time Sheo Shanker Prasad
2005-07-07  7:10 ` David S. Miller
2005-07-07  8:03   ` Sheo Shanker Prasad
2005-07-07  9:53     ` Eric Piel
2005-07-07 18:46 ` Philippe Troin [this message]
2005-07-08 21:51   ` Sheo Shanker Prasad
2005-07-08  0:41 ` michael

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87oe9eo3n5.fsf@ceramic.fifi.org \
    --to=phil@fifi.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ssp@creativeresearch.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox