Re: Ptrace hole / Linux 2.2.25

Martin J. Bligh
2003-03-23T22:46:49Z

>> akpm has suggested something like this in the past. I respectfully
>> disagree.
>
> I also disagree. Although it would be nice, it's not practical. What
> people want is strictly fixes and security related patches, and that
> is ALL I propose to want to include. Perhaps if the vendors
> want a "common vendor" patch they could maintain it? ;)

I still think the common vendor kernel is valuable, but different ;-)
A straight fixes tree is valuable too ... thanks.

M.