From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from ms.lwn.net (ms.lwn.net [45.79.88.28]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4916225A38; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:17:19 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773767840; cv=none; b=C24RzhKoqk1v+2g8v3h9Rk1oheTz22efLBvLWHcwt6gWeYTHlDJYR1MU2jZ6yUeU+uENFqslbsXiCDlgQ0fGrBbJw4TqRZjaT5TRkllTfDba2szPluSBfW1DvFAbh6O6wkB1k76Ws9b3MPejUokWJCbeoEdwh0wz2q8c5U5N1Gs= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773767840; c=relaxed/simple; bh=XhSjXodKL8Rt/Y67hCKslvvCpl7oVhQShD0o7Pvcs6k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=uApy1CPHOLrZ515HxOA1b89z/uLf8u7iYn2Sama9hWW8leC7cK/e1zWCs1lBY7Gty6efK4MGLtxjmbn/KHVnQyR7qEZq/sCxYyUG20sYUsfQImGxHhR254tHR3N2nRaYTJs3WyyivmHtDGIrOg83sXUNX3ViQb+iiAruFzUzBpU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b=FHzC+KyJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=45.79.88.28 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=lwn.net Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=lwn.net header.i=@lwn.net header.b="FHzC+KyJ" DKIM-Filter: OpenDKIM Filter v2.11.0 ms.lwn.net 3DF9A411D3 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=lwn.net; s=20201203; t=1773767839; bh=XhSjXodKL8Rt/Y67hCKslvvCpl7oVhQShD0o7Pvcs6k=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=FHzC+KyJww9n9K3dOwGFMr8Lp8aJM6FHAJXQMgI3cKiLbu9hZ8uNnvgThGuNTGWF1 wmf6vvVafAlxMDplcRgPFok5wx6N1zlNdKfajht6nd8XYJn3gnN5lY8wu1sI8+U0gt o7LWqUEaXBy0YpCmlt/gG8TJ+eYHFJ2EsA1dE6wwgXLIpPvLZQ/By6yef8rMNdqQv1 pQeg6ZPabk/vr6jHl+ObduuveNeGFRm+EkdoFAH5GC6b3tL2cpp70q0Pe2pbsuSDUz D8xjae+mRn6HecwUupnl2ZZjMtvFuixWc2mnPVYmA/S6F1WCWb72kq59+Zir5Dup8L 6FMj92vuJgqNw== Received: from localhost (c-71-229-227-126.hsd1.co.comcast.net [71.229.227.126]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature ECDSA (prime256v1) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3DF9A411D3; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 17:17:19 +0000 (UTC) From: Jonathan Corbet To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, regressions@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] docs: reporting-issues: tweak a few areas and rewrite the ending In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 11:17:18 -0600 Message-ID: <87pl529y01.fsf@trenco.lwn.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Thorsten Leemhuis writes: > This patch-set tweaks a few parts in the fringes of our text on bug > reporting while replacing two sections at the end with a new text as > proper appendix that hopefully better fits the purpose and covers more > aspects. > > This is the first versions of this patch-set, but it starts as v2, as it > contains three patches and a few bits that were part of an earlier and > bigger patch-set. This incorporates review feedback given there. The > last patch in this series is mostly new, but includes a few bits from > patch 4 and 5 of the earlier series. I don't see anything to complain about here ... if nobody screams, I'll apply them in a few days or so. Thanks, jon