From: Ritesh Harjani (IBM) <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
To: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>, linux-mm@kvack.org
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>,
Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>,
Andreas Larsson <andreas@gaisler.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>,
Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
"Liam R. Howlett" <Liam.Howlett@oracle.com>,
Lorenzo Stoakes <lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>, Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
Ryan Roberts <ryan.roberts@arm.com>,
Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>, Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Yeoreum Yun <yeoreum.yun@arm.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org,
xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 03/12] powerpc/mm: implement arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode()
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:45:06 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pl9x41c5.ritesh.list@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20251029100909.3381140-4-kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com> writes:
> Upcoming changes to the lazy_mmu API will cause
> arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() to be called when leaving a nested
> lazy_mmu section.
>
> Move the relevant logic from arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() to
> arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() and have the former call the latter.
>
> Note: the additional this_cpu_ptr() on the
> arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode() path will be removed in a subsequent
> patch.
>
> Signed-off-by: Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@arm.com>
> ---
> .../powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-hash.h | 15 +++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-hash.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-hash.h
> index 146287d9580f..7704dbe8e88d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-hash.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/book3s/64/tlbflush-hash.h
> @@ -41,6 +41,16 @@ static inline void arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> batch->active = 1;
> }
>
> +static inline void arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> +{
> + struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch;
> +
> + batch = this_cpu_ptr(&ppc64_tlb_batch);
> +
> + if (batch->index)
> + __flush_tlb_pending(batch);
> +}
> +
This looks a bit scary since arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() is getting
called from several of the places in later patches().
Although I think arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() will only always be called
in nested lazy mmu case right?
Do you think we can add a VM_BUG_ON(radix_enabled()); in above to make
sure the above never gets called in radix_enabled() case.
I am still going over the patch series, but while reviewing this I
wanted to take your opinion.
Ohh wait.. There is no way of knowing the return value from
arch_enter_lazy_mmu_mode().. I think you might need a similar check to
return from arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() too, if radix_enabled() is true.
-ritesh
> static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> {
> struct ppc64_tlb_batch *batch;
> @@ -49,14 +59,11 @@ static inline void arch_leave_lazy_mmu_mode(void)
> return;
> batch = this_cpu_ptr(&ppc64_tlb_batch);
>
> - if (batch->index)
> - __flush_tlb_pending(batch);
> + arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode();
> batch->active = 0;
> preempt_enable();
> }
>
> -#define arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() do {} while (0)
> -
> extern void hash__tlbiel_all(unsigned int action);
>
> extern void flush_hash_page(unsigned long vpn, real_pte_t pte, int psize,
> --
> 2.47.0
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-05 3:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-10-29 10:08 [PATCH v4 00/12] Nesting support for lazy MMU mode Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 01/12] powerpc/64s: Do not re-activate batched TLB flush Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05 2:46 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 10:29 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-08 0:35 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-07 12:25 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 12:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:08 ` [PATCH v4 02/12] x86/xen: simplify flush_lazy_mmu() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:06 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 12:31 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 15:45 ` Jürgen Groß
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 03/12] powerpc/mm: implement arch_flush_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05 3:15 ` Ritesh Harjani [this message]
2025-11-05 9:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 10:31 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 04/12] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:14 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 05/12] mm: introduce CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_LAZY_MMU_MODE Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:16 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-05 4:40 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 10:33 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 13:56 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 06/12] mm: introduce generic lazy_mmu helpers Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-01 12:18 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-07 14:26 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-11-07 14:34 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-07 15:22 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 07/12] mm: enable lazy_mmu sections to nest Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 16:41 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-10-30 10:28 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-30 16:34 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-01 12:22 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:08 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-05 8:49 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-05 16:12 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-06 10:51 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-06 15:33 ` Alexander Gordeev
2025-11-07 10:16 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-06 16:32 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-06 17:01 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-11-07 11:13 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 14:59 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 08/12] arm64: mm: replace TIF_LAZY_MMU with in_lazy_mmu_mode() Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:03 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-03 18:25 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 15:28 ` Ryan Roberts
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 09/12] powerpc/mm: replace batch->active " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:05 ` David Hildenbrand
2025-11-04 11:33 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-05 9:40 ` Ritesh Harjani
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 10/12] sparc/mm: " Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:11 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 11/12] x86/xen: use lazy_mmu_state when context-switching Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 16:15 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-03 18:29 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-03 19:23 ` David Hildenbrand (Red Hat)
2025-11-04 11:28 ` Kevin Brodsky
2025-10-29 10:09 ` [PATCH v4 12/12] mm: bail out of lazy_mmu_mode_* in interrupt context Kevin Brodsky
2025-11-07 15:42 ` Ryan Roberts
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pl9x41c5.ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--to=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=Liam.Howlett@oracle.com \
--cc=agordeev@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andreas@gaisler.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=dwmw2@infradead.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=kevin.brodsky@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=lorenzo.stoakes@oracle.com \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
--cc=ryan.roberts@arm.com \
--cc=sparclinux@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=surenb@google.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=vbabka@suse.cz \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
--cc=yeoreum.yun@arm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).