From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fab Stz <fabstz-it@yahoo.fr>, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] ? system is stuck in clocksource, >60s delay at boot time without tsc=unstable
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:59:11 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plkoau8w.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9b58a9e-eb56-4acd-b854-0b5ccb8e6759@yahoo.fr>
On Sat, Jan 04 2025 at 23:02, Fab Stz wrote:
> Le 03/01/2025 à 20:02, John Stultz a écrit :
> When building the kernel from the sources from the stable repo of the
> kernel to try a git bisect I couldn't reproduce a case where the warning
> is before loading '/init' with the versions I mentioned as working.
> Maybe I was just lucky as you mentioned. If the warning comes before the
> loading of USB modules, there is no delay. If it comes after, there is a
> delay.
This is a timing problem, which depends on kernel configuration and
run-time differences, but that's just a symptom. It explains why you are
seeing it sometimes and sometimes not. Nothing else.
> If I break/pause at the beginning of the /init script, the warning never
> comes before. I don't really understand what is happening and where the
> problem actually lies (kernel? systemd? udev? somewhere else?). If I add
> a "sleep 5" as 1st command in "/init" it would take ages. So as long as
> the warning from the clocksource is not displayed, the delays seem
> completely wrong.
That's an interesting data point because that 'sleep 5' puts the system
into idle and probably into deep idle for the first time during boot.
> Maybe the USB drivers somehow rely on a reliable clock source for
> proper functioning.
The kernel relies on a reliable clocksource. Loading the USB driver merely
exposes the problem because it probably causes a long enough delay to
get the CPUs into a state which exposes the issue.
AFAICT, that iMac 9.1 is Core 2 Duo based and that generation of
processors definitely had issues with the TSC in deeper idle states.
> BTW, I tried the "processor.max_cstate=1" you mentioned but it didn't
> change anything on the delay and/or warning.
That's weird, but we have no idea what kind of magic the BIOS implements
there for power management behind the kernels back. I assume that it
does because this generation of CPUs uses the ACPI processor idle driver
and that disables TSC when it detects that the system supports
C-states > 1.
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/
tells which idle driver is actually in use.
# ls /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/
tells which states are supported by the driver
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state$N/name
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state$N/disable
tells the actual C-state name and the disabled state, but I expect that
there is nothing to see.
Can you try 'idle=halt' instead?
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-15 16:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <10cf96aa-1276-4bd4-8966-c890377030c3.ref@yahoo.fr>
2024-11-27 7:18 ` [REGRESSION] ? system is stuck in clocksource, >60s delay at boot time without tsc=unstable Fab Stz
2024-12-27 12:39 ` Fab Stz
2025-01-02 21:49 ` John Stultz
2025-01-02 21:56 ` John Stultz
2025-01-03 15:38 ` Fab Stz
2025-01-03 19:02 ` John Stultz
2025-01-04 22:02 ` Fab Stz
2025-01-15 16:59 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-02-23 17:01 ` Fab Stz
2025-02-24 8:13 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-25 8:11 ` Fab Stz
2025-02-25 19:35 ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-25 22:37 ` [PATCH] intel_idle: Handle older CPUs, which stop the TSC in deeper C states, correctly Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-26 10:24 ` Rafael J. Wysocki
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plkoau8w.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=fabstz-it@yahoo.fr \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jstultz@google.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox