public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Fab Stz <fabstz-it@yahoo.fr>, John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>,
	Anna-Maria Behnsen <anna-maria@linutronix.de>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] ? system is stuck in clocksource, >60s delay at boot time without tsc=unstable
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2025 17:59:11 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plkoau8w.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b9b58a9e-eb56-4acd-b854-0b5ccb8e6759@yahoo.fr>

On Sat, Jan 04 2025 at 23:02, Fab Stz wrote:
> Le 03/01/2025 à 20:02, John Stultz a écrit :
> When building the kernel from the sources from the stable repo of the 
> kernel to try a git bisect I couldn't reproduce a case where the warning 
> is before loading '/init' with the versions I mentioned as working. 
> Maybe I was just lucky as you mentioned. If the warning comes before the 
> loading of USB modules, there is no delay. If it comes after, there is a 
> delay.

This is a timing problem, which depends on kernel configuration and
run-time differences, but that's just a symptom. It explains why you are
seeing it sometimes and sometimes not. Nothing else.

> If I break/pause at the beginning of the /init script, the warning never 
> comes before. I don't really understand what is happening and where the 
> problem actually lies (kernel? systemd? udev? somewhere else?). If I add 
> a "sleep 5" as 1st command in "/init" it would take ages. So as long as 
> the warning from the clocksource is not displayed, the delays seem 
> completely wrong.

That's an interesting data point because that 'sleep 5' puts the system
into idle and probably into deep idle for the first time during boot.

> Maybe the USB drivers somehow rely on a reliable clock source for
> proper functioning.

The kernel relies on a reliable clocksource. Loading the USB driver merely
exposes the problem because it probably causes a long enough delay to
get the CPUs into a state which exposes the issue.

AFAICT, that iMac 9.1 is Core 2 Duo based and that generation of
processors definitely had issues with the TSC in deeper idle states.

> BTW, I tried the "processor.max_cstate=1" you mentioned but it didn't 
> change anything on the delay and/or warning.

That's weird, but we have no idea what kind of magic the BIOS implements
there for power management behind the kernels back. I assume that it
does because this generation of CPUs uses the ACPI processor idle driver
and that disables TSC when it detects that the system supports
C-states > 1.

# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpuidle/

tells which idle driver is actually in use.

# ls /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/

tells which states are supported by the driver

# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state$N/name
# cat /sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpuidle/state$N/disable

tells the actual C-state name and the disabled state, but I expect that
there is nothing to see.

Can you try 'idle=halt' instead?

Thanks,

        tglx

  reply	other threads:[~2025-01-15 16:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <10cf96aa-1276-4bd4-8966-c890377030c3.ref@yahoo.fr>
2024-11-27  7:18 ` [REGRESSION] ? system is stuck in clocksource, >60s delay at boot time without tsc=unstable Fab Stz
2024-12-27 12:39   ` Fab Stz
2025-01-02 21:49     ` John Stultz
2025-01-02 21:56       ` John Stultz
2025-01-03 15:38         ` Fab Stz
2025-01-03 19:02           ` John Stultz
2025-01-04 22:02             ` Fab Stz
2025-01-15 16:59               ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-02-23 17:01                 ` Fab Stz
2025-02-24  8:13                   ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-25  8:11                     ` Fab Stz
2025-02-25 19:35                       ` Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-25 22:37                         ` [PATCH] intel_idle: Handle older CPUs, which stop the TSC in deeper C states, correctly Thomas Gleixner
2025-02-26 10:24                           ` Rafael J. Wysocki

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=87plkoau8w.ffs@tglx \
    --to=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=anna-maria@linutronix.de \
    --cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
    --cc=fabstz-it@yahoo.fr \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox