From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: "Liang, Kan" <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
peterz@infradead.org, mingo@redhat.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Oliver Sang <oliver.sang@intel.com>,
Dhananjay Ugwekar <Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/rapl: Move the pmu allocation out of CPU hotplug
Date: Tue, 08 Oct 2024 22:23:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87ploas5rb.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <3b65fd68-8f5b-4029-8dbd-46c0b2cc34c7@linux.intel.com>
On Tue, Oct 08 2024 at 16:10, Kan Liang wrote:
> On 2024-10-08 12:33 p.m., Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 13 2024 at 10:10, kan liang wrote:
>>> +static void __init init_rapl_pmu(void)
>>> +{
>>> + struct rapl_pmu *pmu;
>>> + s32 rapl_pmu_idx;
>>> + int cpu;
>>> +
>>> + cpus_read_lock();
>>> +
>>> + for_each_cpu(cpu, cpu_online_mask) {
>>
>> How is that supposed to work, when not all CPUs are online when
>> init_rapl_pmus() is invoked?
>>
>
> RAPL is a module. The module_init() is called during do_initcalls(),
> which is after the smp_init(). The cpu_online_mask has been setup in the
> smp_init().
>
> I also patched the kernel to double check. The cpu_online_mask indeed
> shows all the online CPUs.
>
> [ 7.021212] smp: Brought up 1 node, 48 CPUs
> [ 7.021212] smpboot: Total of 48 processors activated (211200.00
> BogoMIPS)
> ... ...
> [ 16.557323] RAPL PMU: rapl_pmu_init: cpu_online_mask 0xffffffffffff
1) Start your kernel with maxcpus=2 (not recommended, but ...)
2) Load the module
3) Online the rest of the CPUs from userspace
If your machine has more than one die you might be surprised...
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 20:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-09-13 17:10 [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/rapl: Move the pmu allocation out of CPU hotplug kan.liang
2024-09-13 17:10 ` [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/rapl: Clean up cpumask and hotplug kan.liang
2024-10-08 16:33 ` [PATCH 1/2] perf/x86/rapl: Move the pmu allocation out of CPU hotplug Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-08 20:10 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-08 20:23 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-10-08 20:36 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-10-08 21:05 ` Liang, Kan
2024-10-08 22:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87ploas5rb.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=Dhananjay.Ugwekar@amd.com \
--cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox