From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Laura Nao <laura.nao@collabora.com>
Cc: kernel@collabora.com, laura.nao@collabora.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, regressions@leemhuis.info,
regressions@lists.linux.dev, x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [REGRESSION] mainline boot regression on AMD Stoney Ridge Chromebooks
Date: Thu, 04 Apr 2024 20:06:50 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87plv59f45.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87sf019kbd.ffs@tglx>
Laura!
On Thu, Apr 04 2024 at 18:14, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Can you please provide 'cpuid -r' output too as 'cpuid' does a few
> tweaks to the raw data and it's hard to match it back to the code.
Don't bother. I think I figured it out.
Can you please test the patch below?
Thanks,
tglx
---
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
index 1a8b3ad493af..0d91a04b1741 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/topology_amd.c
@@ -29,7 +29,17 @@ static bool parse_8000_0008(struct topo_scan *tscan)
if (!sft)
sft = get_count_order(ecx.cpu_nthreads + 1);
- topology_set_dom(tscan, TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN, sft, ecx.cpu_nthreads + 1);
+ /*
+ * cpu_nthreads describes the number of threads in the package
+ * sft is the number of APIC ID bits per package
+ *
+ * As the number of actual threads per core is not described in
+ * this leaf, just set the CORE domain shift and let the later
+ * parsers set SMT shift. Assume one thread per core by default
+ * which is correct if there are no other CPUID leafs to parse.
+ */
+ topology_update_dom(tscan, TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN, 0, 1);
+ topology_set_dom(tscan, TOPO_CORE_DOMAIN, sft, ecx.cpu_nthreads + 1);
return true;
}
@@ -73,12 +83,14 @@ static bool parse_8000_001e(struct topo_scan *tscan, bool has_0xb)
tscan->c->topo.initial_apicid = leaf.ext_apic_id;
/*
- * If leaf 0xb is available, then SMT shift is set already. If not
- * take it from ecx.threads_per_core and use topo_update_dom() -
- * topology_set_dom() would propagate and overwrite the already
- * propagated CORE level.
+ * If leaf 0xb is available, then the domain shifts are set
+ * already and nothing to do here.
*/
if (!has_0xb) {
+ /*
+ * Leaf 0x80000008 set the CORE domain shift already.
+ * Update the SMT domain, but do not propagate it.
+ */
unsigned int nthreads = leaf.core_nthreads + 1;
topology_update_dom(tscan, TOPO_SMT_DOMAIN, get_count_order(nthreads), nthreads);
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-04 18:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 37+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-03-22 17:52 [REGRESSION] mainline boot regression on AMD Stoney Ridge Chromebooks Laura Nao
2024-03-28 9:44 ` Laura Nao
2024-03-28 11:50 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-04 8:24 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-04 9:26 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-04 13:01 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 13:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 15:23 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-04 16:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 18:06 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2024-04-04 19:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-04 20:05 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-05 8:14 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-05 8:42 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-05 10:32 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-05 13:38 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-05 13:58 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-05 14:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08 8:20 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-08 11:06 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-08 14:19 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-09 10:07 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-09 12:25 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 8:15 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-10 13:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 16:11 ` Laura Nao
2024-04-10 19:34 ` Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 19:45 ` [patch 0/2] x86/cpu/amd: Fixup the topology rework fallout Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 19:45 ` [patch 1/2] x86/cpu/amd: Make the CPUID 0x80000008 parser correct Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 12:45 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 10:12 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-10 19:45 ` [patch 2/2] x86/cpu/amd: Make the NODEID_MSR union actually work Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 12:45 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-12 10:12 ` tip-bot2 for Thomas Gleixner
2024-04-11 11:27 ` [patch 0/2] x86/cpu/amd: Fixup the topology rework fallout Laura Nao
2024-04-11 11:37 ` Linux regression tracking (Thorsten Leemhuis)
2024-04-11 12:14 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87plv59f45.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=kernel@collabora.com \
--cc=laura.nao@collabora.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=regressions@leemhuis.info \
--cc=regressions@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox