Re: [PATCH] KVM: VMX: fix crash cleanup when KVM wasn't used

Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-09-01T10:37:20Z

Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> writes:

> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 03:45:26PM -0700, Jim Mattson wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 24, 2020 at 11:57 AM Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Fri, Aug 21, 2020 at 8:40 PM Sean Christopherson
>> > <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com> wrote:
>> > > I agree the code is a mess (kvm_init() and kvm_exit() included), but I'm
>> > > pretty sure hardware_disable_nolock() is guaranteed to be a nop as it's
>> > > impossible for kvm_usage_count to be non-zero if vmx_init() hasn't
>> > > finished.
>> >
>> > Unless I'm missing something, there's no check for a non-zero
>> > kvm_usage_count on this path. There is such a check in
>> > hardware_disable_all_nolock(), but not in hardware_disable_nolock().
>>
>> However, cpus_hardware_enabled shouldn't have any bits set, so
>> everything's fine. Nothing to see here, after all.
>
> Ugh, I forgot that hardware_disable_all_nolock() does a BUG_ON() instead of
> bailing on !kvm_usage_count.

But we can't hit this BUG_ON(), right? I'm failing to see how
hardware_disable_all_nolock() can be reached with kvm_usage_count==0.

--
Vitaly