From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>, elver@google.com, paulmck@kernel.org
Cc: peterz@infradead.org, bp@alien8.de, mingo@kernel.org,
mark.rutland@arm.com, dvyukov@google.com, glider@google.com,
andreyknvl@google.com, kasan-dev@googlegroups.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
syzbot+8db9e1ecde74e590a657@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kcsan: Treat runtime as NMI-like with interrupt tracing
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2020 22:18:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pn7yxnjc.fsf@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200807090031.3506555-1-elver@google.com>
Marco Elver <elver@google.com> writes:
> Since KCSAN instrumentation is everywhere, we need to treat the hooks
> NMI-like for interrupt tracing. In order to present an as 'normal' as
> possible context to the code called by KCSAN when reporting errors, we
> need to update the IRQ-tracing state.
>
> Tested: Several runs through kcsan-test with different configuration
> (PROVE_LOCKING on/off), as well as hours of syzbot testing with the
> original config that caught the problem (without CONFIG_PARAVIRT=y,
> which appears to cause IRQ state tracking inconsistencies even when
> KCSAN remains off, see Link).
>
> Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/0000000000007d3b2d05ac1c303e@google.com
> Fixes: 248591f5d257 ("kcsan: Make KCSAN compatible with new IRQ state tracking")
> Reported-by: syzbot+8db9e1ecde74e590a657@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
> Co-developed-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
> ---
> Patch Note: This patch applies to latest mainline. While current
> mainline suffers from the above problem, the configs required to hit the
> issue are likely not enabled too often (of course with PROVE_LOCKING on;
> we hit it on syzbot though). It'll probably be wise to queue this as
> normal on -rcu, just in case something is still off, given the
> non-trivial nature of the issue. (If it should instead go to mainline
> right now as a fix, I'd like some more test time on syzbot.)
I'd rather stick it into mainline before -rc1.
Reviewed-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-08-10 20:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-08-07 9:00 [PATCH] kcsan: Treat runtime as NMI-like with interrupt tracing Marco Elver
2020-08-07 17:06 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-08-10 8:07 ` Marco Elver
2020-08-10 12:34 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-08-10 14:06 ` peterz
2020-08-10 20:18 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2020-08-11 6:56 ` Marco Elver
2020-08-17 7:10 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pn7yxnjc.fsf@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=syzbot+8db9e1ecde74e590a657@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox