From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755969AbeEaSFa (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2018 14:05:30 -0400 Received: from out01.mta.xmission.com ([166.70.13.231]:56865 "EHLO out01.mta.xmission.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755848AbeEaSFY (ORCPT ); Thu, 31 May 2018 14:05:24 -0400 From: ebiederm@xmission.com (Eric W. Biederman) To: Nagarathnam Muthusamy Cc: Konstantin Khlebnikov , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Jann Horn , Serge Hallyn , Oleg Nesterov , Andy Lutomirski , Prakash Sangappa , Andrew Morton References: <152286911105.615669.14053871624892399807.stgit@buzz> <87h8oqhagl.fsf@xmission.com> <112c7cac-1982-3a2e-ffc0-878bc5ae4bb6@yandex-team.ru> <778ab3d0-b6bc-fdb5-669a-40222e5020d4@yandex-team.ru> <3e2c285a-1bf8-f71d-1b74-4d6465c29a54@yandex-team.ru> <3bdd6b27-0a46-5802-8671-07268cecc1c7@oracle.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2018 13:05:17 -0500 In-Reply-To: <3bdd6b27-0a46-5802-8671-07268cecc1c7@oracle.com> (Nagarathnam Muthusamy's message of "Thu, 31 May 2018 10:41:20 -0700") Message-ID: <87po1bd7ky.fsf@xmission.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-XM-SPF: eid=1fORww-0003Jb-NS;;;mid=<87po1bd7ky.fsf@xmission.com>;;;hst=in01.mta.xmission.com;;;ip=97.119.124.205;;;frm=ebiederm@xmission.com;;;spf=neutral X-XM-AID: U2FsdGVkX1/sSwYiAl/QCKHWjCEqYwwEt3ycQNcfepA= X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 97.119.124.205 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ebiederm@xmission.com X-Spam-Report: * -1.0 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP * 0.0 TVD_RCVD_IP Message was received from an IP address * 0.0 T_TM2_M_HEADER_IN_MSG BODY: No description available. * -0.0 BAYES_40 BODY: Bayes spam probability is 20 to 40% * [score: 0.3918] * -0.0 DCC_CHECK_NEGATIVE Not listed in DCC * [sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1] X-Spam-DCC: XMission; sa01 1397; Body=1 Fuz1=1 Fuz2=1 X-Spam-Combo: ;Nagarathnam Muthusamy X-Spam-Relay-Country: X-Spam-Timing: total 654 ms - load_scoreonly_sql: 0.05 (0.0%), signal_user_changed: 5 (0.8%), b_tie_ro: 4.5 (0.7%), parse: 1.18 (0.2%), extract_message_metadata: 64 (9.8%), get_uri_detail_list: 0.83 (0.1%), tests_pri_-1000: 23 (3.5%), tests_pri_-950: 2.00 (0.3%), tests_pri_-900: 1.60 (0.2%), tests_pri_-400: 60 (9.1%), check_bayes: 58 (8.9%), b_tokenize: 24 (3.7%), b_tok_get_all: 10 (1.5%), b_comp_prob: 3.1 (0.5%), b_tok_touch_all: 2.3 (0.4%), b_finish: 0.77 (0.1%), tests_pri_0: 468 (71.6%), check_dkim_signature: 0.83 (0.1%), check_dkim_adsp: 16 (2.4%), tests_pri_500: 23 (3.6%), rewrite_mail: 0.00 (0.0%) Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v5] pidns: introduce syscall translate_pid X-Spam-Flag: No X-SA-Exim-Version: 4.2.1 (built Thu, 05 May 2016 13:38:54 -0600) X-SA-Exim-Scanned: Yes (on in01.mta.xmission.com) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Nagarathnam Muthusamy writes: > Ping? Any additional comments on this patch? Konstantin's v5 no. I am uncomfortable with unnecessary flexibility. I don't want to encourage the increased usage of pids to identify namespaces. I saw no arguments in favor of pids to identify namespaces from Konstantin. Your v4 updated to reflect Andrew Morton's concerns in the changelog yes. Eric