From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@kernel.org>
To: Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>,
Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com>,
John Youn <John.Youn@synopsys.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>,
"linux-usb\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-usb@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel\@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dwc2: gadget: Fix in control write transfers
Date: Mon, 03 Apr 2017 10:05:59 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pogu7yy0.fsf@linux.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <410670D7E743164D87FA6160E7907A56FD9F6775@am04wembxb.internal.synopsys.com>
Hi,
Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com> writes:
>> Minas Harutyunyan <Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com> writes:
>>> After data out stage gadget driver should not initate ZLP on control EP,
>>> because it is up to function driver.
>>
>> not true always, depends on return value from ->setup(). Which problem
>> did you have? Which gadget driver? How did you reproduce? Which other
>> tests did you run on this patch?
>>
>
> This required for delayed status support. Tested with Synopsys test
> gadget. As host used USB tracer traffic generator (different control
> transfers scenarios). Also performed smoke tests with mass storage
> function to detect any side effects.
so you didn't test any gadget driver that doesn't rely on
delayed_status, right? Care to test one of those?
The situation here is a little too complex (and we're trying to change
it). Here's how it goes:
if (ctrl->wLength == 0) /* 2-stage ctrl */ {
gadget_driver always queues STATUS;
} else {
gadget_driver queues DATA;
if (result == DELAYED_STATUS)
gadgdet_driver queues STATUS
else
UDC handles STATUS
}
It seems to me, you're not handling this properly as of yet. Please make
sure several gadget drivers work for you. Try g_mass_storage and g_zero
at least. :-)
--
balbi
prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-04-03 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-03-28 18:04 [PATCH] dwc2: gadget: Fix in control write transfers Minas Harutyunyan
2017-03-30 10:42 ` Felipe Balbi
2017-04-03 5:32 ` Minas Harutyunyan
2017-04-03 7:05 ` Felipe Balbi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pogu7yy0.fsf@linux.intel.com \
--to=balbi@kernel.org \
--cc=John.Youn@synopsys.com \
--cc=Minas.Harutyunyan@synopsys.com \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox