From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand
        id S1760492AbcINKDh (ORCPT <rfc822;w@1wt.eu>);
        Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:03:37 -0400
Received: from mga04.intel.com ([192.55.52.120]:10603 "EHLO mga04.intel.com"
        rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
        id S1753804AbcINKDf (ORCPT <rfc822;linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>);
        Wed, 14 Sep 2016 06:03:35 -0400
X-ExtLoop1: 1
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.30,333,1470726000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="1055783277"
From: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@linux.intel.com>
To: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, Martin Steigerwald <martin@lichtvoll.de>
Cc: kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>, daniel.vetter@intel.com,
        intel-gfx@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Subject: Re: 4.8-rc1: it is now common that machine needs re-run of xrandr after resume
In-Reply-To: <20160914074354.GA7132@amd>
Organization: Intel Finland Oy - BIC 0357606-4 - Westendinkatu 7, 02160 Espoo
References: <20160913202350.GA30707@amd> <2521657.mCnHBphecV@merkaba> <20160914074354.GA7132@amd>
User-Agent: Notmuch/0.22.1+63~g648dcc7 (https://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:03:32 +0300
Message-ID: <87poo6re6j.fsf@intel.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <linux-kernel.vger.kernel.org>
X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org

On Wed, 14 Sep 2016, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz> wrote:
> Intel folks, any ideas? Can you reproduce it?

It's possible (but not confirmed yet) we've seen this in our CI, but has
slipped through because it's sporadic.

BR,
Jani.


-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center