Re: [PATCH 0/9] mm, hugetlb: clean-up and possible bug fix

Joonsoo Kim
2013-07-16T01:45:58Z

On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 09:27:29AM +0800, Sam Ben wrote:
> On 07/16/2013 09:10 AM, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> >On Mon, Jul 15, 2013 at 07:40:16PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
> >>Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@lge.com> writes:
> >>
> >>>First 5 patches are almost trivial clean-up patches.
> >>>
> >>>The others are for fixing three bugs.
> >>>Perhaps, these problems are minor, because this codes are used
> >>>for a long time, and there is no bug reporting for these problems.
> >>>
> >>>These patches are based on v3.10.0 and
> >>>passed sanity check of libhugetlbfs.
> >>does that mean you had run with libhugetlbfs test suite ?
> >Yes! I can't find any reggression on libhugetlbfs test suite.
>
> Where can get your test case?

These are my own test cases.
I will plan to submit these test cases to libhugetlbfs test suite.

Thanks.

>
> >
> >>-aneesh
> >>
> >>--
> >>To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >>the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >>More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >>Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
> >--
> >To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> >the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
> >More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> >Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Don't email: email@kvack.org