From: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
To: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: akpm@linux-foundation.org, kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, venki@google.com,
Mike Travis <travis@sgi.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/cpumask.c: Optimize __any_online_cpu() calculation
Date: Thu, 16 Feb 2012 09:21:23 +1030 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87pqdfbthw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F3BBED4.2090101@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 19:49:00 +0530, "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> On 02/15/2012 06:27 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
>
> > Le mercredi 15 février 2012 à 18:05 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat a écrit :
> >> __any_online_cpu() uses a for loop at the moment.
> >> Instead, use cpumask_* operations to speed it up.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >> Actually, the patch posted at https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/15/101 removed
> >> the last user of any_online_cpu() (and hence __any_online_cpu()).
> >> However, since this is an exported symbol, I refrained from removing this
> >> function altogether.
> >
> > Just remove the export/function and eventually leave the helper ?
> >
> > #define any_online_cpu(mask) cpumask_any_and(mask, cpu_online_mask)
> >
>
>
> That sounds good. Here is v2 of the patch.
> (Since this v2 touches include/linux/cpumask.h, I rebased it on top of the
> patch posted at: https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/15/2. Even without that
> patch it should apply with minor line number changes..)
No. Just git rid of the only caller of any_online_cpu():
arch/ia64/kernel/smpboot.c:693: new_cpei_cpu = any_online_cpu(cpu_online_map);
Thanks,
Rusty.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-16 1:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-15 12:35 [PATCH] lib/cpumask.c: Optimize __any_online_cpu() calculation Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-15 12:57 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 14:19 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
2012-02-15 22:51 ` Rusty Russell [this message]
2012-02-17 12:19 ` Srivatsa S. Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87pqdfbthw.fsf@rustcorp.com.au \
--to=rusty@rustcorp.com.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=kosaki.motohiro@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srivatsa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=travis@sgi.com \
--cc=venki@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox