From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755402Ab1LXDCe (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:02:34 -0500 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.10.76.45]:53210 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752015Ab1LXDCd (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Dec 2011 22:02:33 -0500 From: Rusty Russell To: Ohad Ben-Cohen , Linus Torvalds Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, virtualization , linux-arm Subject: Re: [RESENDx2] [PULL] virtio: fix barriers for virtio-mmio In-Reply-To: References: <8739cbkgv2.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.6.1-1 (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i686-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Sat, 24 Dec 2011 13:31:14 +1030 Message-ID: <87pqfeisg5.fsf@rustcorp.com.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Fri, 23 Dec 2011 13:35:26 +0200, Ohad Ben-Cohen wrote: > On Fri, Dec 23, 2011 at 11:35 AM, Linus Torvalds > wrote: > > On x86, there really is never any reason to use the heavy memory > > barriers unless you are talking to a real device. And last I saw, > > "virtio" was still about virtual IO. Not any more, as the commit message describes. But I missed that they're using rpmsg, which isn't merged yet. Sorry for the noise, Rusty. PS. Switching barriers by bus type is too crude anyway, let's come up with something better...