From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
niv@us.ibm.com, dvhltc@us.ibm.com, dhowells@redhat.com,
lethal@linux-sh.org, kernel@wantstofly.org, matthew@wil.cx
Subject: Re: [PATCH] v3 RCU: the bloatwatch edition
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:52:41 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87prfukz46.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20090402154444.b143efcf.akpm@linux-foundation.org> (Andrew Morton's message of "Thu, 2 Apr 2009 15:44:44 -0700")
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> writes:
> On Fri, 3 Apr 2009 00:36:05 +0200
> Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> wrote:
>
>>
>> Andrew, what do you think?
>
> I'm really struggling to see how the 900-odd bytes saved justifies
> creating (yet another) variant of core kernel machinery.
Also it's unclear if anything special cased !SMP is worth it for the
future. After all multi core or SMT is becoming more and more common even in
the embedded world.
-Andi
--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-03 6:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-03 18:34 [PATCH] v2 RCU: the bloatwatch edition Paul E. McKenney
2009-03-29 20:31 ` [PATCH] v3 " Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-02 22:36 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-02 22:44 ` Andrew Morton
2009-04-03 0:02 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-03 6:52 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2009-04-03 10:45 ` Lennert Buytenhek
2009-04-02 22:44 ` Paul Mundt
2009-04-08 16:38 ` Ingo Molnar
2009-04-08 16:55 ` Paul Mundt
2009-04-08 18:44 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-28 14:24 ` David Howells
2009-04-28 19:45 ` Paul E. McKenney
2009-04-28 21:39 ` David Howells
2009-04-29 0:57 ` Paul E. McKenney
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87prfukz46.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=dvhltc@us.ibm.com \
--cc=kernel@wantstofly.org \
--cc=lethal@linux-sh.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=matthew@wil.cx \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
--cc=niv@us.ibm.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox