From: Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>
To: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu>,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@gmail.com>,
linux kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@kernel.org>,
Ivan Seskar <Seskar@winlab.rutgers.edu>,
jfm3 <jfm3@winlab.rutgers.edu>, Sujith <m.sujith@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Bug on 2.6.26 - x86 VIA Nehemiah CentaurHauls processor cannot boot
Date: Sat, 26 Jul 2008 20:31:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87prp07b0y.fsf@basil.nowhere.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4885DF9D.2090804@zytor.com> (H. Peter Anvin's message of "Tue, 22 Jul 2008 09:24:45 -0400")
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> writes:
> Ingo Molnar wrote:
>>>
>>> Not a bug.
>> it would still be nice to get a nice printk and panic during bootup
>> instead of some obscure crash, hm?
>>
>
> Yes. The fundamental problem is that Centaur has a set of CPUs which
> report family == 6 but don't have the long NOP instructions. We would
> need an exact CPUID criterion for these CPUs in order to be able to
> report it as an error. An alternative would be to attempt trapping in
> the real-mode code (#UD is one of the *very* few CPU exceptions which
> can be reliably captured in real mode on a BIOS system), but doing so
> would probably mean breaking Loadlin at the very least.
>
> We can't "printk and panic" because we never get that far in the
> kernel proper, for obvious reasons: the code is quite littered with
> these buggers.
This was originally supposed to be handled in the early real mode
head.S code. That is why I put the CPUID checking code in there
to error out early when you can still print to the console
using the BIOS functions.
I suspect this regressed when that code was moved to C, because
now the C compiler generates CMOV early.
How about always building the real mode C code with -march=i386?
It is not performance critical so that is ok.
-Andi
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-26 18:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-07-21 13:14 Bug on 2.6.26 - x86 VIA Nehemiah CentaurHauls processor cannot boot Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-07-21 13:23 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-21 14:01 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-07-21 23:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-22 4:47 ` Luis R. Rodriguez
2008-07-22 13:10 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-22 17:10 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-07-22 18:21 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-22 18:33 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-07-22 18:41 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-22 23:28 ` Jeff Garzik
2008-07-23 0:31 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-22 13:14 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-22 13:24 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-22 13:46 ` Ingo Molnar
2008-07-22 13:54 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-26 18:31 ` Andi Kleen [this message]
2008-07-26 18:35 ` H. Peter Anvin
2008-07-26 18:44 ` Andi Kleen
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87prp07b0y.fsf@basil.nowhere.org \
--to=andi@firstfloor.org \
--cc=Seskar@winlab.rutgers.edu \
--cc=hpa@kernel.org \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=jfm3@winlab.rutgers.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.sujith@gmail.com \
--cc=mcgrof@gmail.com \
--cc=mingo@elte.hu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox