From: Elias Oltmanns <eo@nebensachen.de>
To: "Török Edwin" <edwintorok@gmail.com>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>,
Joe Peterson <joe@skyrush.com>,
Linux Kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:59:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87prpyx6v8.fsf@denkblock.local> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4869EABD.1090009@gmail.com> ("Török Edwin"'s message of "Tue, 01 Jul 2008 11:28:45 +0300")
Török Edwin <edwintorok@gmail.com> wrote:
> Elias Oltmanns wrote:
[...]
>> Since commit ec5b1157f8e819c72fc93aa6d2d5117c08cdc961, users have been
>> unable to interrupt interactive processes reliably by pressing CTRL+C.
>> This patch reverts the original commit except for the most important
>> part: actually echoing ^C is preserved.
>>
>
> Thanks for the patch , the process seems to respond faster to Ctrl-C,
> but I'll have to find a way to measure that reliably.
> However ^C is not echoed anymore for me.
Very odd, it most definitely is echoed here. Are you quite sure you
haven't inadvertently changed anything else in the meantime?
Regards,
Elias
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-07-01 10:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-28 10:38 Ctrl+C doesn't interrupt process waiting for I/O Török Edwin
2008-06-29 2:44 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-29 2:45 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-29 3:42 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-29 5:13 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-29 5:39 ` Avi Kivity
2008-06-29 6:25 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-29 7:45 ` Török Edwin
2008-06-29 23:57 ` Bill Davidsen
2008-06-29 12:37 ` Alan Cox
2008-06-30 17:35 ` J. Bruce Fields
2008-06-29 7:09 ` Török Edwin
2008-06-29 7:23 ` David Newall
2008-06-29 12:10 ` Andi Kleen
2008-06-29 16:02 ` Jeremy Fitzhardinge
2008-06-30 10:30 ` Helge Hafting
2008-07-01 7:47 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-01 8:02 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-01 8:28 ` Török Edwin
2008-07-01 9:59 ` Elias Oltmanns [this message]
2008-07-01 12:07 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-01 8:50 ` David Newall
2008-07-01 9:01 ` Török Edwin
2008-07-01 9:12 ` David Newall
2008-07-01 14:12 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-01 14:48 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-01 16:27 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-02 21:26 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-04 20:10 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-04 20:23 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 21:17 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-11 14:47 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-12 0:44 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-12 10:37 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 21:21 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-04 21:14 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 21:36 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-04 21:44 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-04 22:09 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-05 10:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-05 11:00 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-05 11:34 ` Alan Cox
2008-07-05 12:49 ` Elias Oltmanns
2008-07-05 14:01 ` Andi Kleen
2008-07-05 19:58 ` Joe Peterson
2008-07-06 8:28 ` Elias Oltmanns
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2008-07-03 0:59 Matthew Wilcox
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87prpyx6v8.fsf@denkblock.local \
--to=eo@nebensachen.de \
--cc=alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk \
--cc=edwintorok@gmail.com \
--cc=joe@skyrush.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox