From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9F89C32E733; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 10:14:34 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769768074; cv=none; b=qQdBHjsV9Jt845SM6MezgYpZ6CXhq1xXKp+TW2USqTc0S7lQlYQupM2H5sBdtACsuuvTEBDgRJ8/bsYQvhOrHFguaTUNeomgbjOonDA+dhMQfvO8jUV5WzYhl7L0o6Vs+WnKk6lw2R6ilZ/+41sS+cQujY9DLI+A7jjm3v6U3Og= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1769768074; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PAnkuqO32ClpKHcX2BWeLyrxvj8SmyJn9Gq4UuehOXo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=pCmkfhRfiKb9bjtnCTwLCFwKvq8K69O+xcXNTUIMy8XLoTAhHNw31rM/cE9qlQMBFOG/VYeZD6p0FZ8YZ8Y8Fd9NrV8Z1fkt5yi3BxrrifcPQnXmY0adS3neJilOlYRJqIcIA7MORoMAtgGYJwGNP93s2vlydEfiN1IbFM68aQA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Bw/m2DGF; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Bw/m2DGF" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id A3067C4CEF7; Fri, 30 Jan 2026 10:14:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1769768074; bh=PAnkuqO32ClpKHcX2BWeLyrxvj8SmyJn9Gq4UuehOXo=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:From; b=Bw/m2DGFK+2+xwTLITydu5hjYD+iwt16S1lj13AERx6IXvyJbBzsExgjG8fK+8RkM xeazubeebOkl2Xx3ssgpjGLnaDgjas0z0MIB9cx+ruBaBe/sbynH2xCL/JtBSWvGRK K55RobIGUmifzjD58kRb2I0q8JRYngN/UFPw8gkZiR+DmEIpTZA6TIlYelulnegtCc D3itABt9wI3crPfQATPAq6lmn15DYtaKx4JoA+uiYPbAnC3wtMbbanl2v0RBQWufnO Hij8KePxIrPB/KQM3M5Vjkv6MKPwbAX14ow/C24ESCJKX/hMfW7V87nPaDb1zIf4MK cRruHHtd1w6Iw== From: Thomas Gleixner To: Jinjie Ruan , catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, oleg@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, luto@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org, wad@chromium.org, kevin.brodsky@arm.com, deller@gmx.de, akpm@linux-foundation.org, charlie@rivosinc.com, ldv@strace.io, mark.rutland@arm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, song@kernel.org, ryan.roberts@arm.com, thuth@redhat.com, ada.coupriediaz@arm.com, broonie@kernel.org, pengcan@kylinos.cn, liqiang01@kylinos.cn, kmal@cock.li, dvyukov@google.com, reddybalavignesh9979@gmail.com, richard.weiyang@gmail.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org Cc: ruanjinjie@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v11 13/14] entry: Inline syscall_exit_work() and syscall_trace_enter() In-Reply-To: <20260128031934.3906955-14-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> References: <20260128031934.3906955-1-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> <20260128031934.3906955-14-ruanjinjie@huawei.com> Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2026 11:14:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87qzr7l858.ffs@tglx> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain On Wed, Jan 28 2026 at 11:19, Jinjie Ruan wrote: > After switch arm64 to Generic Entry, a new hotspot syscall_exit_work() > appeared because syscall_exit_work() is not inlined, so inline > syscall_exit_work(). Also inline syscall_trace_enter() to align with > syscall_exit_work(). Has the same collision problem. I can pick that up and massage it on top of the pending time slice changes. Let me give it a test ride on x86...