From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clocksource/i8253: Acquire the lock disabled interrupts.
Date: Mon, 05 May 2025 15:29:04 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87r013nq3j.ffs@tglx> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250404133116.p-XRWJXf@linutronix.de>
On Fri, Apr 04 2025 at 15:31, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On x86 during boot, clockevent_i8253_disable() can be invoked via
> x86_late_time_init -> hpet_time_init() -> pit_timer_init() which happens
> with enabled interrupts.
> If some of the old i8253 hardware is actually used then lockdep will
> notice that i8253_lock is used in hardirq context. This causes lockdep
> to complain because it observed the lock being acquired with enabled
> interrupts and in hardirq context.
>
> Make clockevent_i8253_disable() acquire the lock with disabled
> interrupts.
This sentence does not make sense. I'll fix it up...
> Fixes: c8c4076723dac ("x86/timer: Skip PIT initialization on modern chipsets")
> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/clocksource/i8253.c | 5 +++--
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c b/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c
> index 39f7c2d736d16..67dcd9c8f1875 100644
> --- a/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c
> +++ b/drivers/clocksource/i8253.c
> @@ -103,8 +103,9 @@ int __init clocksource_i8253_init(void)
> #ifdef CONFIG_CLKEVT_I8253
> void clockevent_i8253_disable(void)
> {
> - raw_spin_lock(&i8253_lock);
> + unsigned long flags;
>
> + raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&i8253_lock, flags);
> /*
> * Writing the MODE register should stop the counter, according to
> * the datasheet. This appears to work on real hardware (well, on
> @@ -133,7 +134,7 @@ void clockevent_i8253_disable(void)
>
> outb_p(0x30, PIT_MODE);
>
> - raw_spin_unlock(&i8253_lock);
> + raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&i8253_lock, flags);
> }
>
> static int pit_shutdown(struct clock_event_device *evt)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-05-05 13:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-04-04 13:31 [PATCH] clocksource/i8253: Acquire the lock disabled interrupts Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-05 8:30 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2025-05-05 13:29 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2025-05-05 13:48 ` [tip: timers/urgent] clocksource/i8253: Use raw_spinlock_irqsave() in clockevent_i8253_disable() tip-bot2 for Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87r013nq3j.ffs@tglx \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=daniel.lezcano@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox